185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23138830)
1. Comparing the onset of maxillary infiltration local anaesthesia and pain experience using the conventional technique vs. the Wand in children.
Kandiah P; Tahmassebi JF
Br Dent J; 2012 Nov; 213(9):E15. PubMed ID: 23138830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Summary of: comparing the onset of maxillary infiltration local anaesthesia and pain experience using the conventional technique vs the Wand in children.
Veerkamp JS
Br Dent J; 2012 Nov; 213(9):460-1. PubMed ID: 23138805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand).
Ran D; Peretz B
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12739685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular permanent first molar teeth: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial comparing buccal and buccal plus lingual infiltration injections in volunteers.
Meechan JG; Kanaa MD; Corbett IP; Steen IN; Whitworth JM
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):764-9. PubMed ID: 16948661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia.
Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.
Costa CG; Tortamano IP; Rocha RG; Francischone CE; Tortamano N
Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15887505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective randomized trial of different supplementary local anesthetic techniques after failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible pulpitis in mandibular teeth.
Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 22414822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
Ram D; Peretz B
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Articaine and lignocaine efficiency in infiltration anaesthesia: a pilot study.
Oliveira PC; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Ranali J
Br Dent J; 2004 Jul; 197(1):45-6; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 15243610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of liposome-encapsulated 0.5% ropivacaine in maxillary dental anaesthesia.
Franz-Montan M; de Paula E; Groppo FC; Ranali J; Volpato MC
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):454-8. PubMed ID: 21831487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transpapillary versus palatal injection technique for maxillary tooth extractions.
Janjua OS; Luqman U; Ibrahim MW; Shah I
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Mar; 22(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 22414352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pulpal anesthesia and cardiovascular parameters with lidocaine with epinephrine and lidocaine with clonidine after maxillary infiltration in type 2 diabetic volunteers.
Milic MS; Brkovic B; Krsljak E; Stojic D
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jul; 20(6):1283-93. PubMed ID: 26427866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of various modes of computerized delivery of local anesthesia in primary maxillary molars.
Ashkenazi M; Blumer S; Eli I
Pediatr Dent; 2006; 28(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 16615373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Comparison of the systems used for providing local anesthesia in dentistry--the Wand (Milestone Scientific) and Injex (Rosch)].
Zarzecka J; Gończowski K; Kesek B; Darczuk D; Zapała J
Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(12):1304-9. PubMed ID: 17642145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
