These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23138830)

  • 21. A randomized controlled trial comparing mandibular local anesthesia techniques in children receiving nitrous oxide-oxygen sedation.
    Naidu S; Loughlin P; Coldwell SE; Noonan CJ; Milgrom P
    Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15106686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficacy of combining a buccal infiltration with an inferior alveolar nerve block for mandibular molars with irreversible pulpitis.
    Parirokh M; Satvati SA; Sharifi R; Rekabi AR; Gorjestani H; Nakhaee N; Abbott PV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 20219602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Articaine buccal infiltration enhances the effectiveness of lidocaine inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
    Int Endod J; 2009 Mar; 42(3):238-46. PubMed ID: 19228214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anesthetic efficacy of a combination palatal and buccal infiltration of the maxillary first molar.
    Guglielmo A; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J
    J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):460-2. PubMed ID: 21419290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the pain perception in children using comfort control syringe and a conventional injection technique during pediatric dental procedures.
    Langthasa M; Yeluri R; Jain AA; Munshi AK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 23514685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
    Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Faster onset and more comfortable injection with alkalinized 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000.
    Malamed SF; Tavana S; Falkel M
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Feb; 34 Spec No 1():10-20. PubMed ID: 23577552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Expanding the use of topical anesthesia in wound management: sequential layered application of topical lidocaine with epinephrine.
    Gaufberg SV; Walta MJ; Workman TP
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 May; 25(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 17499653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children.
    Allen KD; Kotil D; Larzelere RE; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12212873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
    Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
    J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study.
    Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Corbett IP; Meechan JG
    J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):296-8. PubMed ID: 16554198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The intraoral use of EMLA cream in children: a clinical investigation.
    Meechan JG; Donaldson D
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):260-2. PubMed ID: 7989628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for infiltration anesthesia in dentistry. A randomized study.
    Krzemiński TF; Gilowski Ł; Wiench R; Płocica I; Kondzielnik P; Sielańczyk A
    Am J Dent; 2011 Oct; 24(5):305-9. PubMed ID: 22165459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anesthetic efficacy of a repeated intraosseous injection following a primary intraosseous injection.
    Jensen J; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 18215666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pain Perception: Computerized versus Traditional Local Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients.
    Mittal M; Kumar A; Srivastava D; Sharma P; Sharma S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(5):470-4. PubMed ID: 26551372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The efficacy of a repeated infiltration in prolonging duration of pulpal anesthesia in maxillary lateral incisors.
    Scott J; Drum M; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Mar; 140(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 19255176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pain assessment by children and adolescents during intraosseous anaesthesia using a computerized system (QuickSleeper).
    Sixou JL; Marie-Cousin A; Huet A; Hingant B; Robert JC
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2009 Sep; 19(5):360-6. PubMed ID: 19486372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anesthetic efficacy of the anterior middle superior alveolar (AMSA) injection.
    Lee S; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Weaver J
    Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(3):80-9. PubMed ID: 15497297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anesthetic efficacy of 1.8 mL and 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.
    Mikesell A; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18215665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anaesthetic efficacy of a labial infiltration method on the nasopalatine nerve.
    Lassemi E; Motamedi MH; Jafari SM; Talesh KT; Navi F
    Br Dent J; 2008 Nov; 205(10):E21. PubMed ID: 18833207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.