152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23139494)
1. A comparison between 2.0-mm standard and 2.0-mm locking miniplates in the management of mandibular fractures.
Saikrishna D; Shetty SK; Marimallappa TR
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2009 Jun; 8(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 23139494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of 2.0 mm Standard and 2.0 mm Locking Miniplates in Management of Mandibular Fractures: A Clinical Comparative Study.
Shaik M; Subba Raju T; Rao NK; Reddy CK
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Mar; 13(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 24644396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of Locking Miniplates in Managing Mandibular Fractures without Intermaxillary Fixation.
Sweta S; Raj N; Malik M; Kumar A; Kumar M; Ahamed Irfan KA; Rangari P
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(Suppl 1):S131-S134. PubMed ID: 36110774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study of intermaxillary fixation screws and noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study.
Anslem O; Eyituoyo O; Olabode OV; Ademola OA; Adesina AO
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):233-240. PubMed ID: 28386782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Locking Plate System Versus Standard Plate Fixation in the Management of Mandibular Fractures: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Wusiman P; Tuerxun J; Yaolidaxi B; Moming A
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 28(6):1456-1461. PubMed ID: 28708651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A meta-analysis comparing the 2.0-mm locking plate system with the 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system in treatment of mandible fractures.
Zhan S; Jiang Y; Cheng Z; Ye J
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 25(6):2094-7. PubMed ID: 25304139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional versus standard miniplate, lag screws versus miniplates, locking plate versus non-locking miniplates: Management of mandibular fractures, a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wusiman P; Taxifulati D; Weidong L; Moming A
J Dent Sci; 2019 Mar; 14(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 30988882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard 3D Titanium Miniplate Versus Locking 3D Miniplate in Fracture of Mandible: A Prospective Comparative Study.
Singh A; Arunkumar KV
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2016 Jun; 15(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 27298539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional Locking Plate and Conventional Miniplates in the Treatment of Mandibular Anterior Fractures.
Budhraja NJ; Shenoi RS; Badjate SJ; Bang KO; Ingole PD; Kolte VS
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2018; 8(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 29963428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of 2-mm locking miniplates in the management of mandibular fractures without maxillomandibular fixation.
Prabhakar C; Shetty JN; Hemavathy OR; Guruprasad Y
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 2(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 22442606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures.
Agarwal M; Mohammad S; Singh RK; Singh V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1995-2000. PubMed ID: 21272972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation of zygomatic and mandibular fractures with biodegradable plates.
Degala S; Shetty S; Ramya S
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 3(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 23662255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of Mandibular Angle Fractures with Single Three-Dimensional Locking Miniplates without Maxillomandibular Fixation: How Much Fixation Is Required?
Rastogi S; Paul S; Kukreja S; Aggarwal K; Choudhury R; Bhugra A; Indra B NP; Jawaid M
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2017 Sep; 10(3):188-196. PubMed ID: 28751942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures--a randomized clinical study.
Sehgal S; Ramanujam L; Prasad K; Krishnappa R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24780350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Study of Efficacy and the Comparison Between 2.0 mm Locking Plating System and 2.0 mm Standard Plating System in Mandibular Fractures.
Kumar BP; Kumar KA; Venkatesh V; Mohan AP; Ramesh K; Mallikarjun K
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Sep; 14(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 26225079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bite Force Evaluation of Conventional Plating System Versus Locking Plating System for Mandibular Fracture.
Giri KY; Sahu P; Rastogi S; Dandriyal R; Mall S; Singh AP; Indra B NP; Pratap Singh H
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2015 Dec; 14(4):972-8. PubMed ID: 26604472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2 mm single locking miniplates versus 2 mm two non-locking miniplates in symphysis and parasymphysis fracture of mandible.
Vashistha A; Singh M; Chaudhary M; Agarwal N; Kaur G
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28316921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Management of Mandibular Fractures Using Locking and Nonlocking Miniplates.
Wusiman P; Tayie A; Ling W; Moming A
J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):448-452. PubMed ID: 30640857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: a prospective randomized study.
Singh V; Kumar I; Bhagol A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 40(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21194892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
