These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314068)

  • 1. Listener experience and perception of voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2314068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidimensional scaling analysis of dysphonia in two speaker groups.
    Kempster GB; Kistler DJ; Hillenbrand J
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):534-43. PubMed ID: 2072677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual differences in voice quality perception.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 1608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidimensional scaling of breathy voice quality: individual differences in perception.
    Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 16165342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of experience on perceptual spaces when judging synthesized voice quality: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Kisenwether JS; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Sep; 28(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 24929934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Dec; 112(6):3014-21. PubMed ID: 12509023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality.
    Ehrlich B; Lin L; Jiang J
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multidimensional scaling study of voice quality in females.
    Gelfer MP
    Phonetica; 1993; 50(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 8516383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Impact of Dysphonic Voices on Healthy Listeners: Listener Reaction Times, Speech Intelligibility, and Listener Comprehension.
    Evitts PM; Starmer H; Teets K; Montgomery C; Calhoun L; Schulze A; MacKenzie J; Adams L
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2016 Nov; 25(4):561-575. PubMed ID: 27784031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of Dysphonia and Cognitive-Perceptual Listener Strategies on Speech Intelligibility.
    Porcaro CK; Evitts PM; King N; Hood C; Campbell E; White L; Veraguas J
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):806.e7-806.e18. PubMed ID: 31031103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1787-95. PubMed ID: 8817904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K; Barsties B; Iwahashi T; Iwahashi M; Kato C; Iwaki S; Sasai H; Miyauchi A; Matsushiro N; Inohara H; Ogawa M; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures.
    Jannetts S; Lowit A
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.