These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314076)

  • 1. Visual biasing of normal and impaired auditory speech perception.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Hawkins DB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):163-73. PubMed ID: 2314076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using auditory-visual speech to probe the basis of noise-impaired consonant-vowel perception in dyslexia and auditory neuropathy.
    Ramirez J; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1122-33. PubMed ID: 16158666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
    Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Desai S; Stickney G; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):428-40. PubMed ID: 18177171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Causal Inference Model Explains Perception of the McGurk Effect and Other Incongruent Audiovisual Speech.
    Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Feb; 13(2):e1005229. PubMed ID: 28207734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Cross-Modal Phonetic Encoding.
    Shahin AJ; Backer KC; Rosenblum LD; Kerlin JR
    J Neurosci; 2018 Feb; 38(7):1835-1849. PubMed ID: 29263241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Primary modality for speech perception in children with normal and impaired hearing.
    Seewald RC; Ross M; Giolas TG; Yonovitz A
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Mar; 28(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 3981996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Underlying structure of auditory-visual consonant perception by hearing-impaired children and the influences of syllabic compression.
    Busby PA; Tong YC; Clark GM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Jun; 31(2):156-65. PubMed ID: 3398489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-visual speech perception examined by fMRI and PET.
    Sekiyama K; Kanno I; Miura S; Sugita Y
    Neurosci Res; 2003 Nov; 47(3):277-87. PubMed ID: 14568109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A case of impaired auditory and visual speech prosody perception after right hemisphere damage.
    Nicholson KG; Baum S; Cuddy LL; Munhall KG
    Neurocase; 2002; 8(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 12221144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of spectral and temporal cues in vowel identification by listeners with impaired hearing.
    Van Summers W; Leek MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Oct; 35(5):1189-99. PubMed ID: 1447929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phoneme boundaries in normal and hearing-impaired ears.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Apr; 79(4):1101-12. PubMed ID: 3700865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons.
    Walden BE; Busacco DA; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 8487533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration efficiency for speech perception within and across sensory modalities by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Grant KW; Tufts JB; Greenberg S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Feb; 121(2):1164-76. PubMed ID: 17348537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1197-208. PubMed ID: 11008820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of synthetic visual consonant-vowel articulations.
    Walden BE; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 3669649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE; Kelly WJ; Jesteadt W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 2359269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.