These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314077)

  • 41. Beginnings of prosodic organization: intonation and duration patterns of disyllables produced by Japanese and French infants.
    Hallé PA; de Boysson-Bardies B; Vihman MM
    Lang Speech; 1991; 34 ( Pt 4)():299-318. PubMed ID: 1843528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The role of timbre in the segregation of simultaneous voices with intersecting F0 contours.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Sep; 54(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 8414889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody.
    Meyer M; Steinhauer K; Alter K; Friederici AD; von Cramon DY
    Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 15068910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of listeners' experience on the evaluation of intonation contours produced by hearing-impaired children.
    Most T; Shurgi M
    Ear Hear; 1993 Apr; 14(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 8472876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. On the intonation of German intonation questions: the role of the prenuclear region.
    Petrone C; Niebuhr O
    Lang Speech; 2014 Mar; 57(Pt 1):108-46. PubMed ID: 24754223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Perception of the Lexical Accent Contrast in One Variety of East Norwegian.
    Kelly NE; Smiljanić R
    Lang Speech; 2018 Sep; 61(3):339-357. PubMed ID: 28653551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. At the edge of intonation: the interplay of utterance-final F0 movements and voiceless fricative sounds.
    Niebuhr O
    Phonetica; 2012; 69(1-2):7-27. PubMed ID: 23172237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Relationship between acoustic measures and speech naturalness ratings in Parkinson's disease: A within-speaker approach.
    Klopfenstein M
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2015; 29(12):938-54. PubMed ID: 26403503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions.
    Eady SJ; Cooper WE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):402-15. PubMed ID: 3745672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perception and production of rise-fall intonation in American English.
    Steppling ML; Montgomery AA
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Apr; 64(3):451-61. PubMed ID: 12049285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Intonation and Evidentiality in Spanish Polar Interrogatives.
    Escandell-Vidal V
    Lang Speech; 2017 Jun; 60(2):224-241. PubMed ID: 28697698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Acoustic qualities of phonation in young hearing-impaired children.
    Monsen RB
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Jun; 22(2):270-88. PubMed ID: 491555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A study of perception of sentence intonation--evidence from Danish.
    Thorsen NG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):1014-30. PubMed ID: 7358909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
    Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M
    Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The perception of sentence stress in cochlear implant recipients.
    Meister H; Landwehr M; Pyschny V; Wagner P; Walger M
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):459-67. PubMed ID: 21187749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of Farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children.
    Moein N; Khoddami SM; Shahbodaghi MR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():1-6. PubMed ID: 28964276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Consistency of tone-syllable alignment across different syllable structures and speaking rates.
    Xu Y
    Phonetica; 1998; 55(4):179-203. PubMed ID: 9933779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.