BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314082)

  • 1. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 3994589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss.
    Gagné JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 3411023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3884-96. PubMed ID: 21682411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss.
    Souza PE; Turner CW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Interplay Between Cochlear Gain Loss and Temporal Envelope Coding Deficits.
    Verhulst S; Piktel P; Jagadeesh A; Mauermann M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():467-475. PubMed ID: 27080688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.
    Humes LE; Dirks DD; Bell TS; Kincaid GE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):765-73. PubMed ID: 3584685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masking of pure tones by broad-band noise in cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Fernandes MA; Wood EJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 7087412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners.
    Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing.
    Eisenberg LS; Dirks DD; Bell TS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):222-33. PubMed ID: 7731213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midfrequency dysfunction in listeners having high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Sep; 26(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 6645468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.