These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314084)

  • 21. Flow Glottogram Characteristics and Perceived Degree of Phonatory Pressedness.
    Millgård M; Fors T; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2016 May; 30(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 26001499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of intensity on combined glottography.
    Murty GE; Carding PN; Kelly PJ; Lancaster P
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1991 Aug; 16(4):399-400. PubMed ID: 1934558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of an artificially lengthened vocal tract on estimated glottal contact quotient in untrained male voices.
    Gaskill CS; Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 19135851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preliminary Study of the Open Quotient in an Ex Vivo Perfused Human Larynx.
    Mendelsohn AH; Zhang Z; Luegmair G; Orestes M; Berke GS
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Aug; 141(8):751-6. PubMed ID: 26181642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electroglottographic Quasi-open quotient and amplitude in crescendo phonation.
    Hacki T
    J Voice; 1996 Dec; 10(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 8943137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vocal intensity in speakers and singers.
    Titze IR; Sundberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2936-46. PubMed ID: 1629486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of frequency on combined glottography.
    Murty GE; Carding PN; Kelly PJ; Lancaster P
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1991 Jun; 16(3):298-301. PubMed ID: 1879077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic extremes of voice in the light of time domain parameters extracted from the amplitude features of glottal flow and its derivative.
    Vilkman E; Alku P; Vintturi J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):144-57. PubMed ID: 12077506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of transglottal pressure change on fundamental frequency of phonation: preliminary evaluation of the effect of intraoral pressure change.
    Tanaka K; Kitajima K; Kataoka H
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1997; 49(6):300-7. PubMed ID: 9415735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electroglottographic evaluation of gender and vowel effects during modal and vocal fry phonation.
    Chen Y; Robb MP; Gilbert HR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):821-9. PubMed ID: 12381041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aerodynamic measurements: normative data for children ages 6:0 to 10:11 years.
    Weinrich B; Salz B; Hughes M
    J Voice; 2005 Sep; 19(3):326-39. PubMed ID: 16102661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Approximations of open quotient and speed quotient from glottal airflow and EGG waveforms: effects of measurement criteria and sound pressure level.
    Sapienza CM; Stathopoulos ET; Dromey C
    J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 9619977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mean contact quotient using electroglottography in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Yamout B; Al-Zaghal Z; El-Dahouk I; Farhat S; Sibai A; Hamdan AL
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 23583207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Voice Register in Mon: Acoustics and Electroglottography.
    Abramson AS; Tiede MK; Luangthongkum T
    Phonetica; 2015; 72(4):237-56. PubMed ID: 26636544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective quantification of pre- and postphonosurgery vocal fold vibratory characteristics using high-speed videoendoscopy and a harmonic waveform model.
    Ikuma T; Kunduk M; McWhorter AJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 57(3):743-57. PubMed ID: 24167233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Objective measures of voice production in normal subjects following prolonged voice use.
    Stemple JC; Stanley J; Lee L
    J Voice; 1995 Jun; 9(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 7620534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of glottal dynamics in the production of shouted speech.
    Mittal VK; Yegnanarayana B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3050-61. PubMed ID: 23654408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of the voice source from speech pressure signals: evaluation of an inverse filtering technique using physical modelling of voice production.
    Alku P; Story B; Airas M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 16479132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Soft phonation in the male singing voice: a preliminary study.
    Miller DG; Schutte HK; Doing J
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 11792024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Variability of electroglottographic glottal closed quotients: necessity of standardization to obtain normative values.
    Kania RE; Hans S; Hartl DM; Clement P; Crevier-Buchman L; Brasnu DF
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):349-52. PubMed ID: 15023846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.