106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23141878)
1. Reserve selection with land market feedbacks.
Butsic V; Lewis DJ; Radeloff VC
J Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 114():276-84. PubMed ID: 23141878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation.
Armsworth PR; Daily GC; Kareiva P; Sanchirico JN
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Apr; 103(14):5403-8. PubMed ID: 16554375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conservation goals and the relative importance of costs and benefits in reserve selection.
Perhans K; Kindstrand C; Boman M; Djupström LB; Gustafsson L; Mattsson L; Schroeder LM; Weslien J; Wikberg S
Conserv Biol; 2008 Oct; 22(5):1331-9. PubMed ID: 18637912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncertainty analysis for regional-scale reserve selection.
Moilanen A; Wintle BA; Elith J; Burgman M
Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1688-97. PubMed ID: 17181804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The boundary-quality penalty: a quantitative method for approximating species responses to fragmentation in reserve selection.
Moilanen A; Wintle BA
Conserv Biol; 2007 Apr; 21(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 17391186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Aggregating high-priority landscape areas to the parcel level: an easement implementation tool.
Strager MP; Rosenberger RS
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 16580124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficiency and equity in land conservation: the effects of policy scale.
Ay JS; Napoléone C
J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():190-8. PubMed ID: 23939138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marine reserves with ecological uncertainty.
Grafton RQ; Kompas T; Lindenmayer D
Bull Math Biol; 2005 Sep; 67(5):957-71. PubMed ID: 15998490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Site selection of nature reserve based on the self-learning tabu search algorithm with space-ecology set covering problem: An example from Daiyun Mountain, Southeast China].
Huang JH; Liu JF; Lin ZW; Zheng SQ; He ZS; Zhang HG; Li WZ
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Jan; 28(1):219-230. PubMed ID: 29749206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Logic for designing nature reserves for multiple species.
McCarthy MA; Thompson CJ; Williams NS
Am Nat; 2006 May; 167(5):717-27. PubMed ID: 16671015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptions and attitudes of land managers in multi-tenure reserve networks and the implications for conservation.
Fitzsimons JA; Wescott G
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jul; 84(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 16904814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to resolve the SLOSS debate: lessons from species-diversity models.
Tjørve E
J Theor Biol; 2010 May; 264(2):604-12. PubMed ID: 20152842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models.
Moilanen A
Am Nat; 2005 Jun; 165(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 15937749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Land-cover assessment of conservation and buffer zones in the BOSAWAS natural resource reserve of Nicaragua.
Smith JH
Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):252-62. PubMed ID: 12520380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying conservation areas on the basis of alternative distribution data sets.
Underwood JG; D'Agrosa C; Gerber LR
Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 19659686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.
Chen X; Lupi F; Viña A; He G; Liu J
Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1469-78. PubMed ID: 20586786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal dynamic control of invasions: applying a systematic conservation approach.
Adams VM; Setterfield SA
Ecol Appl; 2015 Jun; 25(4):1131-41. PubMed ID: 26465047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The land value impacts of wetland restoration.
Kaza N; BenDor TK
J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():289-99. PubMed ID: 23792789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal dynamic allocation of conservation funding among priority regions.
Bode M; Wilson K; McBride M; Possingham H
Bull Math Biol; 2008 Oct; 70(7):2039-54. PubMed ID: 18712571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
