These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23142038)

  • 41. Effect of reference frames and number of cues available on the spatial orientation of males and females in a virtual memory task.
    Cánovas R; García RF; Cimadevilla JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 20655953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Understanding developmental changes in the stability and flexibility of spatial categories based on object relatedness.
    Hund AM; Foster EK
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Jan; 44(1):218-32. PubMed ID: 18194020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Enhanced context-dependency of object recognition in rats with hippocampal lesions.
    O'Brien N; Lehmann H; Lecluse V; Mumby DG
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 16580742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Compression of environmental representations following interactions with objects.
    Clement A; Radvansky GA; Brockmole JR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2460-2466. PubMed ID: 28828730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cognitive operations on space and their impact on the precision of location memory.
    Lansdale M; Humphries J; Flynn V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1501-19. PubMed ID: 23506139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. No environmental context-dependent effect, but interference, of physical activity on object location memory.
    Hammond AG; Murphy EM; Silverman BM; Bernas RS; Nardi D
    Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 30076514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A limited role for the hippocampus in the modulation of novel-object preference by contextual cues.
    Piterkin P; Cole E; Cossette MP; Gaskin S; Mumby DG
    Learn Mem; 2008 Oct; 15(10):785-91. PubMed ID: 18832565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Object location memory: the interplay of multiple representations.
    Wang H; Johnson TR; Sun Y; Zhang J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Oct; 33(7):1147-59. PubMed ID: 16532850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Sensorimotor alignment effects in the learning environment and in novel environments.
    Kelly JW; Avraamides MN; Loomis JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1092-107. PubMed ID: 17983315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Characteristics of object location memory in mice: Behavioral and pharmacological studies.
    Murai T; Okuda S; Tanaka T; Ohta H
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan; 90(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 17049363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of gaze and prior knowledge on allocentric coding of reach targets.
    Lu Z; Klinghammer M; Fiehler K
    J Vis; 2018 Apr; 18(4):22. PubMed ID: 29710312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The mental wormhole: internal attention shifts without regard for distance.
    Tanoue RT; Berryhill ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1199-215. PubMed ID: 22549808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Further explorations.
    Radvansky GA; Krawietz SA; Tamplin AK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1632-45. PubMed ID: 21563019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge.
    Easton RD; Sholl MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):483-500. PubMed ID: 7738511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Spatial updating according to a fixed reference direction of a briefly viewed layout.
    Zhang H; Mou W; McNamara TP
    Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):419-29. PubMed ID: 21439561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Memory consolidation of landmarks in good navigators.
    Janzen G; Jansen C; van Turennout M
    Hippocampus; 2008; 18(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 17924521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cue interaction between buildings and street configurations during reorientation in familiar and unfamiliar outdoor environments.
    Wang L; Mou W; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 29094988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Representations of interobject spatial relations in long-term memory.
    Rump B; McNamara TP
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Feb; 41(2):201-13. PubMed ID: 23007235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Interobject spacing explains the attentional bias toward interacting objects.
    Meyerhoff HS; Schwan S; Huff M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Apr; 21(2):412-7. PubMed ID: 23921510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.