These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314223)

  • 1. Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 2314223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
    Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Altering memory through recall: the effects of cue-guided retrieval processing.
    McDaniel MA; Kowitz MD; Dunay PK
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):423-34. PubMed ID: 2761400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prior knowledge and cued recall: category size and dominance.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1985; 98(4):503-17. PubMed ID: 4096333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Encoding and cuing sounds and senses.
    Nelson DL; Friedrich MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Nov; 6(6):717-31. PubMed ID: 7441188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.
    McKenzie WA; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):321-31. PubMed ID: 1895942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior knowledge: the effects of natural category size on memory for implicitly encoded concepts.
    Nelson DL; Bajo MT; McEvoy CL; Schreiber TA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):957-67. PubMed ID: 2528608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Holley PE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 1435270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.
    Shaw RJ; Craik FI
    Psychol Aging; 1989 Jun; 4(2):131-5. PubMed ID: 2789740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Butler KM; Williams CC; Zacks RT; Maki RH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 11550757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit memory: effects of network size and interconnectivity on cued recall.
    Nelson DL; Bennett DJ; Gee NR; Schreiber TA; McKinney VM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jul; 19(4):747-64. PubMed ID: 8345322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of target set size on feelings of knowing and cued recall: implications for the cue effectiveness and partial-retrieval hypotheses.
    Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1998 May; 26(3):553-71. PubMed ID: 9610124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of implicit memory on explicit recall: set size and word-frequency effects.
    Nelson DL; Xu J
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(3-4):203-14. PubMed ID: 7753950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentence encoding and implicitly activated memories.
    Nelson DL; Gee NR; Schreiber TA
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):643-54. PubMed ID: 1435267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Source memory in the absence of successful cued recall.
    Cook GI; Marsh RL; Hicks JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):828-35. PubMed ID: 16822150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
    Carpenter SK; Pashler H; Vul E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Oct; 13(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 17328380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.
    Nelson DL; Fisher SL; Akirmak U
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):1892-904. PubMed ID: 18265606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How the size of the to-be-learned material influences the encoding and later retrieval of associative memories: A pupillometric assessment.
    Pajkossy P; Racsmány M
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226684. PubMed ID: 31891588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.