These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314225)

  • 1. On time differences in searching for letters in words and nonwords: do they emerge during the initial encoding or the subsequent scan?
    Johnson NF; Carnot MJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 2314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of intraword and interword letter repetition: a test of the word unitization hypothesis.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 2913456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of letter repetition in words and nonwords: the effect of opposite-case distractors.
    Krueger LE; Stadtlander LM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):942-50. PubMed ID: 1837305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recognition of letters in words and nonwords.
    Allegretti CL; Puglisi JT
    J Gen Psychol; 1982 Jul; 107(1st Half):139-48. PubMed ID: 7119756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Temporal separation of two part-letter arrays and size changes in a nonmasking work-superiority effect.
    Solman RT
    Perception; 1987; 16(5):655-69. PubMed ID: 3451193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding.
    Krueger LE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 1435271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Letter detection with rapid serial visual presentation: evidence against word superiority at feature extraction.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Nov; 5(4):657-673. PubMed ID: 528966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of memorized works and nonwords.
    Deboeck M; Hueting J; Soetens E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 7290885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory scanning in a visual search task by schizophrenics and normals.
    Pharr DR; Connor JM
    J Clin Psychol; 1980 Jul; 36(3):625-31. PubMed ID: 7410557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The familiarity effect for single-letter pairs.
    Ambler BA; Proctor JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 May; 2(2):222-34. PubMed ID: 830185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.
    LaBerge D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Jun; 9(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 6223977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings: a reply to Krueger's comments.
    Massaro DW; Venezky RL; Taylor GA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):131-2. PubMed ID: 528897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are whole words perceptual units in reading?
    Silverman WP; Ulatowski PE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Dec; 53(3):811-26. PubMed ID: 7322780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the role of word frequency in the detection of component letters.
    Johnson NF; Allen PA; Strand TL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):474-82. PubMed ID: 2761405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Familiarity effects and word unitization in visual comparison tasks.
    Marmurek HH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Jul; 17(4):483-9. PubMed ID: 2761406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tilted letters and tilted words: a possible role for principal axes in visual word recognition.
    Driver J; Baylis GC
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):560-8. PubMed ID: 7476242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces.
    Bentin S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Jun; 117(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 2969032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dissociative word-frequency X levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.
    Duchek JM; Neely JH
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):148-62. PubMed ID: 2927313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adult age differences in the effects of sentence context and stimulus degradation during visual word recognition.
    Madden DJ
    Psychol Aging; 1988 Jun; 3(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 3268255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the flexibility of letter position coding during lexical processing: evidence from eye movements when reading Thai.
    Winskel H; Perea M; Ratitamkul T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(8):1522-36. PubMed ID: 22502779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.