These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314225)

  • 21. The use of language structure by demented patients in a visual search task.
    Nebes RD; Boller F
    Cortex; 1987 Mar; 23(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 3568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Identification of words and letters within words.
    Johnson NF; Marmurek HH
    Am J Psychol; 1978 Sep; 91(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 742661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On non-adjacent letter repetition and orthographic processing: Lexical decisions to nonwords created by repeating or inserting letters in words.
    Kerr E; Mirault J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):596-609. PubMed ID: 33236286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detecting letters in continuous text: effects of display size.
    Healy AF; Oliver WL; McNamara TP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1987 May; 13(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 2953857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The PIG in sPrInG: evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words.
    Humphreys GW; Mayall K; Cooper AC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):939-46. PubMed ID: 15000542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification of letters in the predesignated target paradigm: a word superiority effect for the common word the.
    Peterzell DH; Sinclair GP; Healy AF; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1990; 103(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 2221192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial representations of words and nonwords.
    Nicoletti R; Umiltà C; Mapelli D
    Cortex; 1992 Jun; 28(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 1499303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthographic transparency modulates the grain size of orthographic processing: behavioral and ERP evidence from bilingualism.
    Lallier M; Carreiras M; Tainturier MJ; Savill N; Thierry G
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1505():47-60. PubMed ID: 23419894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Recognition and lexical decision without detection: unconscious perception?
    Merikle PM; Reingold EM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):574-83. PubMed ID: 2144572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The word-detection effect: sophisticated guessing or perceptual enhancement?
    Prinzmetal W; Lyon CE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 May; 24(3):331-41. PubMed ID: 8718767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The role of nasals in reading: a normative study in French.
    Joubert S; Lecours AR
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):175-9. PubMed ID: 11527322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaction between lateralization of memory and probe stimulus in the recognition of verbal and spatial visual stimuli.
    Berrini R; Capitani E; Della Sala S; Spinnler H
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):517-20. PubMed ID: 6483179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Event-related potentials during memory search and selective attention to letter size and conjunctions of letter size and color.
    Wijers AA; Mulder G; Okita T; Mulder LJ
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Sep; 26(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 2616701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Episodic effects on the visual comparison of letters in words.
    Marmurek HH
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Nov; 52(5):553-61. PubMed ID: 1437488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Familiarity affects visual processing of words.
    Pollatsek A; Well AD; Schindler RM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Nov; 1(4):328-38. PubMed ID: 1185120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of same-category and different-category extraneous memory sets on item recognition.
    Diener D
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):575-83. PubMed ID: 7968553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.