These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2314227)

  • 1. The conjunction fallacy?
    Wolford G; Taylor HA; Beck JR
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2314227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A pattern recognition account of decision making.
    Massaro DW
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):616-27. PubMed ID: 7968557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Typicality and reasoning fallacies.
    Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN
    Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z; Pothos EM; Trueblood JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 25621376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Representativeness and conjoint probability.
    Gavanski I; Roskos-Ewoldsen DR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1991 Aug; 61(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 1920061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Broken Physics: A Conjunction-Fallacy Effect in Intuitive Physical Reasoning.
    Ludwin-Peery E; Bramley NR; Davis E; Gureckis TM
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Dec; 31(12):1602-1611. PubMed ID: 33137265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reasoning about conjunctive probabilistic concepts in childhood.
    Fisk JE; Slattery R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Sep; 59(3):168-78. PubMed ID: 16248496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary on Wolford, Taylor, and Beck: The conjunction fallacy?
    Bar-Hillel M
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jul; 19(4):412-4; discussion 415-7. PubMed ID: 1895951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why the Conjunction Effect Is Rarely a Fallacy: How Learning Influences Uncertainty and the Conjunction Rule.
    Maguire P; Moser P; Maguire R; Keane MT
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1011. PubMed ID: 30022958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Probability error in diagnosis: the conjunction fallacy among beginning medical students.
    Rao G
    Fam Med; 2009 Apr; 41(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 19343556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is There a Conjunction Fallacy in Legal Probabilistic Decision Making?
    Wojciechowski BW; Pothos EM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():391. PubMed ID: 29674983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The conjunction fallacy and the many meanings of and.
    Hertwig R; Benz B; Krauss S
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):740-53. PubMed ID: 18723167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness.
    Stolarz-Fantino S; Fantino E; Zizzo DJ; Wen J
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 12710220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the reality of the conjunction fallacy.
    Sides A; Osherson D; Bonini N; Viale R
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Mar; 30(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 12035881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exemplars in the mist: the cognitive substrate of the representativeness heuristic.
    Nilsson H; Juslin P; Olsson H
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Jun; 49(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 18419587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The conjunction fallacy in rats.
    González VV; Sadeghi S; Tran L; Blaisdell AP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Aug; 30(4):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 36795245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.