These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23143089)
1. Differences in the biologic activity of 2 novel MEK inhibitors revealed by 18F-FDG PET: analysis of imaging data from 2 phase I trials. Kraeber-Bodéré F; Carlier T; Naegelen VM; Shochat E; Lumbroso J; Trampal C; Nagarajah J; Chua S; Hugonnet F; Stokkel M; Gleeson F; Tessier J J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1836-46. PubMed ID: 23143089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phase I and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study of the MEK inhibitor RO4987655 in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Nakamichi S; Nokihara H; Yamamoto N; Yamada Y; Fujiwara Y; Tamura Y; Wakui H; Honda K; Mizugaki H; Kitazono S; Tanabe Y; Asahina H; Yamazaki N; Suzuki S; Matsuoka M; Ogita Y; Tamura T Invest New Drugs; 2015 Jun; 33(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 25809858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Phase I expansion and pharmacodynamic study of the oral MEK inhibitor RO4987655 (CH4987655) in selected patients with advanced cancer with RAS-RAF mutations. Zimmer L; Barlesi F; Martinez-Garcia M; Dieras V; Schellens JH; Spano JP; Middleton MR; Calvo E; Paz-Ares L; Larkin J; Pacey S; Venturi M; Kraeber-Bodéré F; Tessier JJ; Eberhardt WE; Paques M; Guarin E; Meresse V; Soria JC Clin Cancer Res; 2014 Aug; 20(16):4251-61. PubMed ID: 24947927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phase I dose-escalation study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the MEK inhibitor RO4987655 (CH4987655) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Leijen S; Middleton MR; Tresca P; Kraeber-Bodéré F; Dieras V; Scheulen ME; Gupta A; Lopez-Valverde V; Xu ZX; Rueger R; Tessier JJ; Shochat E; Blotner S; Naegelen VM; Schellens JH; Eberhardt WE Clin Cancer Res; 2012 Sep; 18(17):4794-805. PubMed ID: 22767668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of efficacy of a new MEK inhibitor, RO4987655, in human tumor xenografts by [(18)F] FDG-PET imaging combined with proteomic approaches. Tegnebratt T; Ruge E; Bader S; Ishii N; Aida S; Yoshimura Y; Ooi CH; Lu L; Mitsios N; Meresse V; Mulder J; Pawlak M; Venturi M; Tessier J; Stone-Elander S EJNMMI Res; 2014 Dec; 4(1):34. PubMed ID: 26116108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 18F-FDG PET/CT qualitative and quantitative evaluation in neurofibromatosis type 1 patients for detection of malignant transformation: comparison of early to delayed imaging with and without liver activity normalization. Chirindel A; Chaudhry M; Blakeley JO; Wahl R J Nucl Med; 2015 Mar; 56(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 25655626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Added value of baseline 18F-FDG uptake in serial 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of response of solid extracerebral tumors to systemic cytotoxic neoadjuvant treatment: a meta-analysis. Quarles van Ufford HM; van Tinteren H; Stroobants SG; Riphagen II; Hoekstra OS J Nucl Med; 2010 Oct; 51(10):1507-16. PubMed ID: 20847179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prediction and detection of local recurrence after radiofrequency ablation of malignant lung lesions. Singnurkar A; Solomon SB; Gönen M; Larson SM; Schöder H J Nucl Med; 2010 Dec; 51(12):1833-40. PubMed ID: 21078787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monitoring therapy with MEK inhibitor U0126 in a novel Wilms tumor model in Wt1 knockout Igf2 transgenic mice using 18F-FDG PET with dual-contrast enhanced CT and MRI: early metabolic response without inhibition of tumor growth. Flores LG; Yeh HH; Soghomonyan S; Young D; Bankson J; Hu Q; Alauddin M; Huff V; Gelovani JG Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Apr; 15(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 22875335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential (18)F-FDG and 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine PET responses to pharmacologic inhibition of the c-MET receptor in preclinical tumor models. Cullinane C; Dorow DS; Jackson S; Solomon B; Bogatyreva E; Binns D; Young R; Arango ME; Christensen JG; McArthur GA; Hicks RJ J Nucl Med; 2011 Aug; 52(8):1261-7. PubMed ID: 21764800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Phase I and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of RO5126766, a first-in-class dual Raf/MEK inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Honda K; Yamamoto N; Nokihara H; Tamura Y; Asahina H; Yamada Y; Suzuki S; Yamazaki N; Ogita Y; Tamura T Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2013 Sep; 72(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 23860959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Gayed I; Vu T; Iyer R; Johnson M; Macapinlac H; Swanston N; Podoloff D J Nucl Med; 2004 Jan; 45(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 14734662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of a MEK inhibitor (TAK-733) using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in the human lung xenograft model A549. Ishino S; Miyake H; Vincent P; Mori I Ann Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 29(7):613-20. PubMed ID: 26014721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Areas of high 18F-FDG uptake on preradiotherapy PET/CT identify preferential sites of local relapse after chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer. Calais J; Thureau S; Dubray B; Modzelewski R; Thiberville L; Gardin I; Vera P J Nucl Med; 2015 Feb; 56(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 25572091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography versus computed tomography in predicting histopathological response to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. van Gool MH; Aukema TS; Schaake EE; Rijna H; Codrington HE; Valdés Olmos RA; Teertstra HJ; van Pel R; Burgers SA; van Tinteren H; Klomp HM Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 21(9):2831-7. PubMed ID: 24845729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Chen W; Silverman DH; Delaloye S; Czernin J; Kamdar N; Pope W; Satyamurthy N; Schiepers C; Cloughesy T J Nucl Med; 2006 Jun; 47(6):904-11. PubMed ID: 16741298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions. Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) as a non-invasive pharmacodynamic biomarker to determine the minimally pharmacologically active dose of AZD8835, a novel PI3Kα inhibitor. Maynard J; Emmas SA; Ble FX; Barjat H; Lawrie E; Hancox U; Polanska UM; Pritchard A; Hudson K PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183048. PubMed ID: 28806782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preclinical FLT-PET and FDG-PET imaging of tumor response to the multi-targeted Aurora B kinase inhibitor, TAK-901. Cullinane C; Waldeck KL; Binns D; Bogatyreva E; Bradley DP; de Jong R; McArthur GA; Hicks RJ Nucl Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 41(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 24332383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preclinical and clinical evidence that Deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography is a reliable tool for the detection of early molecular responses to erlotinib in head and neck cancer. Vergez S; Delord JP; Thomas F; Rochaix P; Caselles O; Filleron T; Brillouet S; Canal P; Courbon F; Allal BC Clin Cancer Res; 2010 Sep; 16(17):4434-45. PubMed ID: 20660574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]