BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23143426)

  • 1. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoyte L; Rabbanifard R; Mezzich J; Bassaly R; Downes K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(6):335-9. PubMed ID: 23143426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detailed Cost Analysis of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy Compared to Transvaginal Mesh Repair.
    Ehlert MJ; Gupta P; Park J; Sirls LT
    Urology; 2016 Nov; 97():86-91. PubMed ID: 27496298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
    Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
    Chen CC; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis.
    Elliott CS; Hsieh MH; Sokol ER; Comiter CV; Payne CK; Chen B
    J Urol; 2012 Feb; 187(2):638-43. PubMed ID: 22177180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
    Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
    Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective?
    Waters JA; Canal DF; Wiebke EA; Dumas RP; Beane JD; Aguilar-Saavedra JR; Ball CG; House MG; Zyromski NJ; Nakeeb A; Pitt HA; Lillemoe KD; Schmidt CM
    Surgery; 2010 Oct; 148(4):814-23. PubMed ID: 20797748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perioperative complications of robotic sacrocolpopexy for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
    Anand M; Woelk JL; Weaver AL; Trabuco EC; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB
    Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1193-200. PubMed ID: 24715099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.
    Smith A; Kurpad R; Lal A; Nielsen M; Wallen EM; Pruthi RS
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):505-9. PubMed ID: 20006882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse.
    Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost-analysis study of robotic versus conventional mitral valve repair.
    Kam JK; Cooray SD; Kam JK; Smith JA; Almeida AA
    Heart Lung Circ; 2010 Jul; 19(7):413-8. PubMed ID: 20356784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
    Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
    Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study.
    Breitenstein S; Nocito A; Puhan M; Held U; Weber M; Clavien PA
    Ann Surg; 2008 Jun; 247(6):987-93. PubMed ID: 18520226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative hospital cost-analysis of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Tomaszewski JJ; Matchett JC; Davies BJ; Jackman SV; Hrebinko RL; Nelson JB
    Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):126-9. PubMed ID: 22608294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.