These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23143759)

  • 1. A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity.
    Kurtenbach A; Langrová H; Messias A; Zrenner E; Jägle H
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 126(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 23143759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of CRT and LCD monitors for objective estimation of visual acuity using the sweep VEP.
    Straßer T; Leinberger DT; Hillerkuss D; Zrenner E; Zobor D
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2022 Oct; 145(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 35788850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective assessment of visual acuity: a refined model for analyzing the sweep VEP.
    Strasser T; Nasser F; Langrová H; Zobor D; Lisowski Ł; Hillerkuss D; Sailer C; Kurtenbach A; Zrenner E
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 138(2):97-116. PubMed ID: 30694438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual acuities "hand motion" and "counting fingers" can be quantified with the freiburg visual acuity test.
    Schulze-Bonsel K; Feltgen N; Burau H; Hansen L; Bach M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 47(3):1236-40. PubMed ID: 16505064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment: overestimation in amblyopia.
    Wenner Y; Heinrich SP; Beisse C; Fuchs A; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 128(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 24623357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique.
    Mackay AM; Bradnam MS; Hamilton R; Elliot AT; Dutton GN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):438-41. PubMed ID: 18172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual acuity in unilateral cataract.
    Thompson DA; Møller H; Russell-Eggitt I; Kriss A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 80(9):794-8. PubMed ID: 8942375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the performance of six stimulus paradigms in visual acuity assessment based on steady-state visual evoked potentials.
    Zheng X; Xu G; Wu Y; Wang Y; Du C; Wu Y; Zhang S; Han C
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Dec; 141(3):237-251. PubMed ID: 32405730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resolving the clinical acuity categories "hand motion" and "counting fingers" using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT).
    Lange C; Feltgen N; Junker B; Schulze-Bonsel K; Bach M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 247(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 18766368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the "Freiburg Acuity VEP" on Commercial Equipment.
    Bach M; Farmer JD
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):139-145. PubMed ID: 31584130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients.
    Bach M; Maurer JP; Wolf ME
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 92(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 18303162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting potential acuities in amblyopes: predicting post-therapy acuity in amblyopes.
    Ridder WH; Rouse MW
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 114(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 17310345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus.
    Katsumi O; Arai M; Wajima R; Denno S; Hirose T
    Vision Res; 1996 Mar; 36(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 8736223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing enfant and PowerDiva sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates.
    Ridder WH; Waite BS; Melton TF
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2014 Oct; 129(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 25150841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of mental load on psychophysical and visual evoked potential visual acuity.
    Mahjoob M; Heravian Shandiz J; Anderson AJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 May; 42(3):586-593. PubMed ID: 35150443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Age norms for monocular grating acuity measured by sweep-VEP in the first three years of age.
    Salomão SR; Ejzenbaum F; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Pereira JM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2008; 71(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 18797653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment.
    Good WV
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():253-69. PubMed ID: 11797314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing Performance of Single-Channel SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment via Mode Decomposition.
    Zheng X; Zhang X; Xu G; Zhang R
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():4203-4210. PubMed ID: 37812551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.