These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23143917)

  • 1. Spatial interference between attended items engenders serial visual processing.
    Yamani Y; McCarley JS; Mounts JR; Kramer AF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):229-43. PubMed ID: 23143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of salience in localized attentional interference.
    Mounts JR; Gavett BE
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(13):1575-88. PubMed ID: 15126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional templates regulate competitive interactions among attended visual objects.
    Mounts JR; McCarley JS; Terech AM
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 17557591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence that within-dimension features are generally processed coactively.
    Blunden AG; Howe PDL; Little DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):193-227. PubMed ID: 31254263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):621-32. PubMed ID: 26754949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory: suppressions and enhancements revealed by FMRI.
    Vuilleumier P; Schwartz S; Duhoux S; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Aug; 17(8):1245-60. PubMed ID: 16197681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cued shifts of attention and memory encoding in partial report: a dual-task approach.
    Giesbrecht B; Dixon P; Kingstone A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Aug; 54(3):695-725. PubMed ID: 11548031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing the generality of the zoom-lens model: Evidence for visual-pathway specific effects of attended-region size on perception.
    Goodhew SC; Lawrence RK; Edwards M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1147-1164. PubMed ID: 28303479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rapid top-down control over template-guided attention shifts to multiple objects.
    Grubert A; Fahrenfort J; Olivers CNL; Eimer M
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 146():843-858. PubMed ID: 27554532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the relationship between flanker interference and localized attentional interference.
    McCarley JS; Mounts JR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 May; 128(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 18155179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Speed of Serial Attention Shifts in Visual Search: Evidence from the N2pc Component.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 28(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 26488588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Color-selective attention need not be mediated by spatial attention.
    Andersen SK; Müller MM; Hillyard SA
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):2.1-7. PubMed ID: 19761293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systems factorial technology with R.
    Houpt JW; Blaha LM; McIntire JP; Havig PR; Townsend JT
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Jun; 46(2):307-30. PubMed ID: 24019062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective visual attention ensures constancy of sensory representations: testing the influence of perceptual load and spatial competition.
    Wegener D; Galashan FO; Markowski DN; Kreiter AK
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3563-74. PubMed ID: 16879852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of multiple cued items is possible during visual short-term memory maintenance.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1625-46. PubMed ID: 25824888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?
    Reimer CB; Strobach T; Frensch PA; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1052-69. PubMed ID: 25810162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The spatial distribution of visual attention.
    Gobell JL; Tseng CH; Sperling G
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1273-96. PubMed ID: 15066391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial attention effects during conscious and nonconscious processing of visual features and objects.
    Tapia E; Breitmeyer BG; Jacob J; Broyles EC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):745-56. PubMed ID: 23046142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.