171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23144902)
1. Expectations modulate the magnitude of attentional capture by auditory events.
Nöstl A; Marsh JE; Sörqvist P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48569. PubMed ID: 23144902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What we expect is not always what we get: evidence for both the direction-of-change and the specific-stimulus hypotheses of auditory attentional capture.
Nöstl A; Marsh JE; Sörqvist P
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e111997. PubMed ID: 25393298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Human auditory-cortex mechanisms of preattentive sound discrimination.
Kropotov JD; Alho K; Näätänen R; Ponomarev VA; Kropotova OV; Anichkov AD; Nechaev VB
Neurosci Lett; 2000 Feb; 280(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 10686384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When long appears short: Effects of auditory distraction on event-related potential correlates of time perception.
Getzmann S; Arnau S; Gajewski PD; Wascher E
Eur J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 55(1):121-137. PubMed ID: 34859527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing cross-modal target transition effects with a visual-auditory oddball.
Kiat JE
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jul; 129():58-66. PubMed ID: 29723555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of pitch distance and likelihood on the perceived duration of deviant auditory events.
Kim E; McAuley JD
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1547-58. PubMed ID: 23801322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Task difficulty modulates voluntary attention allocation, but not distraction in an auditory distraction paradigm.
Volosin M; Horváth J
Brain Res; 2020 Jan; 1727():146565. PubMed ID: 31765629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beta oscillatory power modulation reflects the predictability of pitch change.
Chang A; Bosnyak DJ; Trainor LJ
Cortex; 2018 Sep; 106():248-260. PubMed ID: 30053731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes.
Escera C; Corral MJ; Yago E
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 14(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 12421656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mismatch negativity of higher amplitude for melodic ascendance than descendance.
Ruusuvirta TT; Astikainen P
Neuroreport; 2012 Mar; 23(4):220-3. PubMed ID: 22246244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Processing of complex auditory patterns in musicians and nonmusicians.
Boh B; Herholz SC; Lappe C; Pantev C
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e21458. PubMed ID: 21750713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Processing of auditory stimuli during visual attention in patients with schizophrenia.
Alain C; Hargrave R; Woods DL
Biol Psychiatry; 1998 Dec; 44(11):1151-9. PubMed ID: 9836018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes.
Suzuki J; Nittono H; Hori T
Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15598514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mismatch negativity to single and multiple pitch-deviant tones in regular and pseudo-random complex tone sequences.
Vaz Pato M; Jones SJ; Perez N; Sprague L
Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Apr; 113(4):519-27. PubMed ID: 11955996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ERPs to pitch changes: a result of reduced responses to standard tones in rabbits.
Ruusuvirta T; Korhonen T; Arikoski J; Kivirikko K
Neuroreport; 1996 Jan; 7(2):413-6. PubMed ID: 8730794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are lexical tones musical? Native language's influence on neural response to pitch in different domains.
Chen A; Peter V; Wijnen F; Schnack H; Burnham D
Brain Lang; 2018; 180-182():31-41. PubMed ID: 29689493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
