These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23145532)

  • 1. Impact of the introduction of a robotic training programme on prostate cancer stage migration at a single tertiary referral centre.
    Briganti A; Bianchi M; Sun M; Suardi N; Gallina A; Abdollah F; Bertini R; Colombo R; Girolamo VD; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Karakiewicz PI; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1222-30. PubMed ID: 23145532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?
    Punnen S; Meng MV; Cooperberg MR; Greene KL; Cowan JE; Carroll PR
    BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E314-20. PubMed ID: 23451984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.
    Rocco B; Matei DV; Melegari S; Ospina JC; Mazzoleni F; Errico G; Mastropasqua M; Santoro L; Detti S; de Cobelli O
    BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 19426191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on the use and extent of pelvic lymph node dissection in the "post-dissemination" period.
    Gandaglia G; Trinh QD; Hu JC; Schiffmann J; Becker A; Roghmann F; Popa I; Tian Z; Perrotte P; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Sun M; Abdollah F
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1080-6. PubMed ID: 24411705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
    Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter evaluation of guideline adherence for pelvic lymph node dissection in patients undergoing open retropubic vs. laparoscopic or robot assisted radical prostatectomy according to the recent German S3 guideline on prostate cancer.
    Borkowetz A; Bruendl J; Drerup M; Herrmann J; Isbarn H; Beyer B;
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):855-861. PubMed ID: 29427005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.
    Krambeck AE; DiMarco DS; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Myers RP; Blute ML; Gettman MT
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 18778350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.
    Suardi N; Larcher A; Haese A; Ficarra V; Govorov A; Buffi NM; Walz J; Rocco B; Borghesi M; Steuber T; Pini G; Briganti A; Mottrie AM; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Pushkar D; Van Der Poel H;
    Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 24411992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience.
    Yates J; Haleblian G; Stein B; Miller B; Renzulli J; Pareek G
    Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4842-6. PubMed ID: 19796462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
    Doumerc N; Yuen C; Savdie R; Rahman MB; Rasiah KK; Pe Benito R; Delprado W; Matthews J; Haynes AM; Stricker PD
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20067454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
    Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
    Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Schiffmann J; Haese A; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Boehm K; Beyer B; Larcher A; Michl U; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):1547-53. PubMed ID: 26117216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of lymph node yield after pelvic lymph node dissection in men with prostate cancer: a comparison between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and open radical prostatectomy in the modern era.
    Truesdale MD; Lee DJ; Cheetham PJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1055-60. PubMed ID: 20575697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safe introduction of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after a training program in a high-volume robotic centre.
    Lumen N; Van Praet C; De Troyer B; Fonteyne V; Oosterlinck W; Decaestecker K; Mottrie A
    Urol Int; 2013; 91(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 23860435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
    Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of symptomatic lymphoceles after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is independent of surgical approach: a single-center analysis.
    Thomas C; Ziewers S; Thomas A; Dotzauer R; Bartsch G; Haferkamp A; Tsaur I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Apr; 51(4):633-640. PubMed ID: 30796729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
    Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sex hormone-binding globulin is a significant predictor of extracapsular extension in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Salonia A; Gallina A; Briganti A; Zanni G; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Colombo R; Bertini R; Freschi M; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2011 Apr; 107(8):1243-9. PubMed ID: 20883480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.