665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23146637)
1. Rigid versus flexible dentine-like endodontic posts--clinical testing of a biomechanical concept: seven-year results of a randomized controlled clinical pilot trial on endodontically treated abutment teeth with severe hard tissue loss.
Sterzenbach G; Franke A; Naumann M
J Endod; 2012 Dec; 38(12):1557-63. PubMed ID: 23146637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars.
Cagidiaco MC; García-Godoy F; Vichi A; Grandini S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 18686771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of resin-based materials on fracture resistance of endodontically treated thin-walled teeth.
Balkaya MC; Birdal IS
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):296-303. PubMed ID: 23684279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of endodontic posts in structurally compromised roots of maxillary incisors.
Solomon CS; Osman YI
SADJ; 2011 Jun; 66(5):220-3. PubMed ID: 23193862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 10-year survival evaluation for glass-fiber-supported postendodontic restoration: a prospective observational clinical study.
Naumann M; Koelpin M; Beuer F; Meyer-Lueckel H
J Endod; 2012 Apr; 38(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 22414824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dentin-like versus Rigid Endodontic Post: 11-year Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial on No-wall to 2-wall Defects.
Naumann M; Sterzenbach G; Dietrich T; Bitter K; Frankenberger R; von Stein-Lausnitz M
J Endod; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1770-1775. PubMed ID: 28951033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term survival of endodontically treated, maxillary anterior teeth restored with either tapered or parallel-sided glass-fiber posts and full-ceramic crown coverage.
Signore A; Benedicenti S; Kaitsas V; Barone M; Angiero F; Ravera G
J Dent; 2009 Feb; 37(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19091452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance under static and fatigue loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with carbon fiber posts, glass fiber posts, and an experimental dentin post system: an in vitro study.
Ambica K; Mahendran K; Talwar S; Verma M; Padmini G; Periasamy R
J Endod; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 23228265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts.
Naumann M; Preuss A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2007 Feb; 23(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16464492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber reinforced posts and cast gold post and cores cemented with three cements.
Torres-Sánchez C; Montoya-Salazar V; Córdoba P; Vélez C; Guzmán-Duran A; Gutierrez-Pérez JL; Torres-Lagares D
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23929374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of thermomechanical aging on bond strength and interface morphology of glass fiber and zirconia posts bonded with a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhesive resin cement to natural teeth.
Yaman BC; Ozer F; Takeichi T; Karabucak B; Koray F; Blatz MB
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 24680355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning.
Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Nergiz I; Schmage P
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20397499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fiber post placement with core build-up materials or resin cements-an evaluation of different adhesive approaches.
Sterzenbach G; Karajouli G; Naumann M; Peroz I; Bitter K
Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Sep; 70(5):368-76. PubMed ID: 21815838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with glass fiber posts of different lengths.
Franco EB; Lins do Valle A; Pompéia Fraga de Almeida AL; Rubo JH; Pereira JR
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 24161260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Failure analysis and survival rate of post and core restorations under cyclic loading.
Balkenhol M; Rupf S; Laufersweiler I; Huber K; Hannig M
Int Endod J; 2011 Oct; 44(10):926-37. PubMed ID: 21658072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
Balbosh A; Kern M
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems.
Mehta SB; Millar BJ
Br Dent J; 2008 Dec; 205(11):E23. PubMed ID: 19029918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-endodontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review.
Bitter K; Kielbassa AM
Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 18269124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of post material on the characteristic strength of fatigued endodontically treated teeth.
Pereira JR; do Valle AL; Shiratori FK; Ghizoni JS; Bonfante EA
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1225-30. PubMed ID: 24836285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
