These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23147000)

  • 1. Design and optimization of the oriented groove on the hip implant surface to promote bone microstructure integrity.
    Noyama Y; Nakano T; Ishimoto T; Sakai T; Yoshikawa H
    Bone; 2013 Feb; 52(2):659-67. PubMed ID: 23147000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
    Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
    J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimally oriented grooves on dental implants improve bone quality around implants under repetitive mechanical loading.
    Kuroshima S; Nakano T; Ishimoto T; Sasaki M; Inoue M; Yasutake M; Sawase T
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Jan; 48():433-444. PubMed ID: 27838462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation on the effect of groove geometry on cementless femoral stem component in hip arthroplasty.
    Rawal BR; Bhatnagar N
    Pak J Biol Sci; 2013 Dec; 16(24):2073-5. PubMed ID: 24517034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.
    Cook SD; Klawitter JJ; Weinstein AM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Mar; 14(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 7358741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Failure of cementless fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1992 Apr; 23(2):335-46. PubMed ID: 1570145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiscale design and multiobjective optimization of orthopedic hip implants with functionally graded cellular material.
    Arabnejad Khanoki S; Pasini D
    J Biomech Eng; 2012 Mar; 134(3):031004. PubMed ID: 22482684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone stress distribution around the hip joint prosthesis with stepped stem].
    Tan R; Fan H; Wu F; Chen J; Luo J; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 28(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 21936371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimization of custom cementless stem using finite element analysis and elastic modulus distribution for reducing stress-shielding effect.
    Saravana Kumar G; George SP
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Feb; 231(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28056711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design considerations for ceramic resurfaced femoral head: effect of interface characteristics on failure mechanisms.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2010; 13(2):143-55. PubMed ID: 19787497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants.
    Skinner HB; Kilgus DJ; Keyak J; Shimaoka EE; Kim AS; Tipton JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Aug; (305):178-89. PubMed ID: 8050227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of geometrical parameters on the performance of longitudinal functionally graded femoral prostheses.
    Oshkour AA; Talebi H; Seyed Shirazi SF; Yau YH; Tarlochan F; Abu Osman NA
    Artif Organs; 2015 Feb; 39(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 24841371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the change in stem length on the load transfer and bone remodelling for a cemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S; New AM
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):2908-14. PubMed ID: 20728891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.