These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23147000)

  • 21. [Finite element analysis of changes in femoral stresses after elite total hip arthroplasty].
    He RX; Luo YM; Yan SG; Wu HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Sep; 84(18):1549-53. PubMed ID: 15500718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Mesh morphing for finite element analysis of implant positioning in cementless total hip replacements.
    Bah MT; Nair PB; Browne M
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1235-43. PubMed ID: 19744873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of femoral strains with cementless proximal-fill femoral implants of varied stem length.
    Arno S; Fetto J; Nguyen NQ; Kinariwala N; Takemoto R; Oh C; Walker PS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Aug; 27(7):680-5. PubMed ID: 22503474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. Part II: The implant/bone interface.
    Albert K; Schledjewski R; Harbaugh M; Bleser S; Jamison R; Friedrich K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(3):199-211. PubMed ID: 7950869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite element analysis of optimal design of distal geometry of cementless femoral prosthesis.
    Zhao Y; Wang L; Bao Y; Xu R; He S
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1476-1483. PubMed ID: 36149207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cementless implant composition and femoral stress. A finite element analysis.
    Namba RS; Keyak JH; Kim AS; Vu LP; Skinner HB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Feb; (347):261-7. PubMed ID: 9520899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of a genetic algorithm for multiobjective design optimization of the femoral stem of a cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Ishida T; Nishimura I; Tanino H; Higa M; Ito H; Mitamura Y
    Artif Organs; 2011 Apr; 35(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21332564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
    Hedia HS
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessments of different kinds of stems by experiments and FEM analysis: appropriate stress distribution on a hip prosthesis.
    Sakai R; Itoman M; Mabuchi K
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Oct; 21(8):826-33. PubMed ID: 16701927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Surgical variables affect the mechanics of a hip resurfacing system.
    Long JP; Bartel DL
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():115-22. PubMed ID: 17016222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development of optimized epoxy graphite implant for the total hip joint.
    Iyer LS; Jayasekaran T; Blunck CF; Selvam RP
    ISA Trans; 1984; 23(2):7-14. PubMed ID: 6746263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Anatomically adapted endoprosthesis of the proximal end of the femur].
    Henssge EJ; Grundei H; Etspüler R; Köller W; Fink K
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1985; 123(5):821-8. PubMed ID: 4082741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Geometric element analysis of fretting in a model of a modular femoral component of a hip implant.
    Lewis G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 14757952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Stresses on the femur following hip joint replacement].
    Rohlmann A; Mössner U; Bergmann G; Hees G; Kölbel R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1983; 121(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 6845829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.