These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23147857)

  • 1. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
    Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation using partial coherence interferometry in patients with high myopia.
    Roessler GF; Dietlein TS; Plange N; Roepke AK; Dinslage S; Walter P; Mazinani BA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 22512374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Keratometry obtained by corneal mapping versus the IOLMaster in the prediction of postoperative refraction in routine cataract surgery.
    Dulku S; Smith HB; Antcliff RJ
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22594695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation by the IOLMaster in phakic and eyes with hydrophobic acrylic lenses.
    Chang SW; Yu CY; Chen DP
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Jul; 116(7):1336-42. PubMed ID: 19427697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of automated and partial coherence keratometry and resulting choice of toric IOL.
    Ale Magar JB; Cunningham F; Brian G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 90(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 23435222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intraoperative optical refractive biometry for intraocular lens power estimation without axial length and keratometry measurements.
    Ianchulev T; Salz J; Hoffer K; Albini T; Hsu H; Labree L
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1530-6. PubMed ID: 16129287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing the postoperative refractive predictability of Pentacam HR and IOLMaster 500 after a multifocal intraocular lens implantation.
    Andrade Junior N; Hida WT; Messias AMV; Lyra JM; Silva CAM; Alves MR
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2020; 83(2):141-145. PubMed ID: 32159594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery: Scheimpflug keratometry versus standard automated keratometry in virgin corneas.
    Lam S; Gupta BK; Hahn JM; Manastersky NA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1984-7. PubMed ID: 21889873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of IOL power calculation and refractive outcome after laser refractive cataract surgery with a femtosecond laser versus conventional phacoemulsification.
    Filkorn T; Kovács I; Takács A; Horváth E; Knorz MC; Nagy ZZ
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 28(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 22785062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior chamber depth, intraocular lens position, and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
    Engren AL; Behndig A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):572-7. PubMed ID: 23395354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation.
    Fam HB; Lim KL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 19168467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of intraoperative retinoscopy in corneal power and axial length estimation using a high plus soft contact lens.
    Ahmed I; Toufeeq A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 15649183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
    Reitblat O; Assia EI; Kleinmann G; Levy A; Barrett GD; Abulafia A
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):328-34. PubMed ID: 25491591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculations.
    Rajan MS; Keilhorn I; Bell JA
    Eye (Lond); 2002 Sep; 16(5):552-6. PubMed ID: 12194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of refractive outcome using intraoperative biometry and partial coherence interferometry in silicone oil-filled eyes.
    El-Baha SM; Hemeida TS
    Retina; 2009 Jan; 29(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18695632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of refractive outcomes using conventional keratometry or total keratometry for IOL power calculation in cataract surgery.
    Srivannaboon S; Chirapapaisan C
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2677-2682. PubMed ID: 31486917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing ultrasound biometry with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculations: a randomized study.
    Raymond S; Favilla I; Santamaria L
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 50(6):2547-52. PubMed ID: 19168907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictability of Biometry in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.
    Sorkin N; Rosenblatt A; Barequet IS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Dec; 93(12):1545-1551. PubMed ID: 27741085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of Scheimpflug corneal power measurements for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Savini G; Barboni P; Carbonelli M; Hoffer KJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1193-7. PubMed ID: 19545807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.