171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148044)
1. Initial experience of 3 tesla apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Ilica AT; Artaş H; Ayan A; Günal A; Emer O; Kilbas Z; Meric C; Atasoy MM; Uzuner O
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 May; 37(5):1077-82. PubMed ID: 23148044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Mutlu H; Sivrioglu AK; Sonmez G; Velioglu M; Sildiroglu HO; Basekim CC; Kizilkaya E
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22226435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiparametric MR imaging for differentiating between benign and malignant thyroid nodules: initial experience in 23 patients.
Sasaki M; Sumi M; Kaneko K; Ishimaru K; Takahashi H; Nakamura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jul; 38(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 23188483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diffusion-weighted images differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Erdem G; Erdem T; Muammer H; Mutlu DY; Firat AK; Sahin I; Alkan A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 20027577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and ADC Mapping in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
Khizer AT; Raza S; Slehria AU
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Nov; 25(11):785-8. PubMed ID: 26577961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating malignant from benign thyroid nodules with magnetic resonance imaging and pathologic correlation.
Shi HF; Feng Q; Qiang JW; Li RK; Wang L; Yu JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):505-10. PubMed ID: 23863524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules and stratification of papillary thyroid cancer with aggressive histological features: Whole-lesion diffusion-weighted imaging histogram analysis.
Hao Y; Pan C; Chen W; Li T; Zhu W; Qi J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Dec; 44(6):1546-1555. PubMed ID: 27093648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative evaluation of benign and malignant vertebral fractures with diffusion-weighted MRI: what is the optimum combination of b values for ADC-based lesion differentiation with the single-shot turbo spin-echo sequence?
Geith T; Schmidt G; Biffar A; Dietrich O; Duerr HR; Reiser M; Baur-Melnyk A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):582-8. PubMed ID: 25148160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a powerful adjunct to fine needle aspiration cytology for assessment of thyroid nodules.
Nakahira M; Saito N; Murata S; Sugasawa M; Shimamura Y; Morita K; Takajyo F; Omura G; Matsumura S
Am J Otolaryngol; 2012; 33(4):408-16. PubMed ID: 22154066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of apparent diffusion coefficient value calculation in differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules.
Dilli A; Ayaz UY; Cakir E; Cakal E; Gultekin SS; Hekimoglu B
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 22726970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic efficacy of multiple MRI parameters in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules.
Wang H; Wei R; Liu W; Chen Y; Song B
BMC Med Imaging; 2018 Dec; 18(1):50. PubMed ID: 30509198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiation between malignant and benign solitary thyroid nodules.
Razek AA; Sadek AG; Kombar OR; Elmahdy TE; Nada N
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Mar; 29(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 18039755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Application of nuclear magnetic dispersion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in the identification of benign].
Li ZL; Nan J; Cui YT; Du XS; Hao HC; Zhang JF
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 33(4):342-346. PubMed ID: 30970406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: quantitative and qualitative analysis.
Agnello F; Ronot M; Valla DC; Sinkus R; Van Beers BE; Vilgrain V
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):511-9. PubMed ID: 22143926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Higher sensitivity and specificity for diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant lung lesions without apparent diffusion coefficient quantification.
Uto T; Takehara Y; Nakamura Y; Naito T; Hashimoto D; Inui N; Suda T; Nakamura H; Chida K
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):247-54. PubMed ID: 19420317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of the apparent diffusion coefficient in the differential diagnosis of gastric wall thickening.
Onur MR; Ozturk F; Aygun C; Poyraz AK; Ogur E
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Sep; 36(3):672-7. PubMed ID: 22570233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
