These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148455)

  • 1. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
    Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
    Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
    Hartwig M; Bond CF
    Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When and Why Being Ostracized Affects Veracity Judgments.
    Eck J; Schoel C; Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Mar; 46(3):454-468. PubMed ID: 31313631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
    Street CN; Richardson DC
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
    Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deception detection from written accounts.
    Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
    Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Power and lie detection.
    Ulatowska J; Cislak A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269121. PubMed ID: 35679292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
    Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
    Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
    Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
    Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
    Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of deception judgments.
    Bond CF; DePaulo BM
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Effects of probabilistic judgments on negative moods].
    Otto JH
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1994; 41(2):232-60. PubMed ID: 7941621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On being sad and mistaken: mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments.
    Ambady N; Gray HM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 83(4):947-61. PubMed ID: 12374446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
    Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.