268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148455)
1. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
Hartwig M; Bond CF
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When and Why Being Ostracized Affects Veracity Judgments.
Eck J; Schoel C; Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Mar; 46(3):454-468. PubMed ID: 31313631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
Street CN; Richardson DC
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subjective cues to deception/honesty in a high stakes situation: an exploratory approach.
Wright Whelan C; Wagstaff GF; Wheatcroft JM
J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):517-34. PubMed ID: 25975577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deception detection from written accounts.
Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reliability of lie detection performance.
Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Power and lie detection.
Ulatowska J; Cislak A
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269121. PubMed ID: 35679292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unconscious processes improve lie detection.
Reinhard MA; Greifeneder R; Scharmach M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):721-39. PubMed ID: 24219784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is It the Judge, the Sender, or Just the Individual Message? Disentangling Person and Message Effects on Variation in Lie-Detection Judgments.
Volz S; Reinhard MA; Müller P
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2023 Nov; 18(6):1368-1387. PubMed ID: 36791692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of deception judgments.
Bond CF; DePaulo BM
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2006; 10(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 16859438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effects of probabilistic judgments on negative moods].
Otto JH
Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1994; 41(2):232-60. PubMed ID: 7941621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On being sad and mistaken: mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments.
Ambady N; Gray HM
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2002 Oct; 83(4):947-61. PubMed ID: 12374446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
