These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148473)

  • 1. Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes.
    Yang CT; Chang TY; Wu CJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1365-85. PubMed ID: 23148473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative saliency in change signals affects perceptual comparison and decision processes in change detection.
    Yang CT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Dec; 37(6):1708-28. PubMed ID: 21767050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative salience affects the process of detecting changes in orientation and luminance.
    Yang CT; Hsu YF; Huang HY; Yeh YY
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Nov; 138(3):377-89. PubMed ID: 21974871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing.
    Chang TY; Little DR; Yang CT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1603-24. PubMed ID: 27188653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making.
    Yang CT; Little DR; Hsu CC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2256-75. PubMed ID: 24939235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence of different underlying processes in pattern recall and decision-making.
    Gorman AD; Abernethy B; Farrow D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1813-31. PubMed ID: 25662705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures.
    Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1739-59. PubMed ID: 19933559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The electrophysiological correlate of saliency: evidence from a figure-detection task.
    Straube S; Fahle M
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():89-102. PubMed ID: 19854163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision-theoretic saliency: computational principles, biological plausibility, and implications for neurophysiology and psychophysics.
    Gao D; Vasconcelos N
    Neural Comput; 2009 Jan; 21(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 19210172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Error rate and outcome predictability affect neural activation in prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate during decision-making.
    Paulus MP; Hozack N; Frank L; Brown GG
    Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):836-46. PubMed ID: 11906224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implicit learning modulates selective attention at sensory levels of perceptual processing.
    Couperus JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):342-51. PubMed ID: 19304623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Additional-singleton interference in efficient visual search: a common salience route for detection and compound tasks.
    Zehetleitner M; Proulx MJ; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1760-70. PubMed ID: 19933560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task.
    Beck MR; Angelone BL; Levin DT; Peterson MS; Varakin DA
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Dec; 17(4):1192-208. PubMed ID: 18684642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive decision making in a dynamic environment: a test of a sequential sampling model of relative judgment.
    Vuckovic A; Kwantes PJ; Neal A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Sep; 19(3):266-84. PubMed ID: 24059826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The neural processing fate of singleton target and nontarget stimuli.
    Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1307():115-33. PubMed ID: 19833112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
    Yap MJ; Balota DA; Cortese MJ; Watson JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1324-44. PubMed ID: 17154775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual long-term memory and change blindness: Different effects of pre- and post-change information on one-shot change detection using meaningless geometric objects.
    Nishiyama M; Kawaguchi J
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Nov; 30():105-17. PubMed ID: 25282403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences.
    D'Angelo MC; Jiménez L; Milliken B; Lupiáñez J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):69-84. PubMed ID: 22612164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning where to direct gaze during change detection.
    Droll JA; Gigone K; Hayhoe MM
    J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):6.1-12. PubMed ID: 18217801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of visual signals on spatial decision making.
    Danziger S; Rafal R
    Cognition; 2009 Feb; 110(2):182-97. PubMed ID: 19121825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.