182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148475)
1. How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 23148475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22733226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
Brown A
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Schulte N; Holling H; Bürkner PC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):262-289. PubMed ID: 37929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.
Walton KE; Cherkasova L; Roberts RD
Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 31007043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format Character Measure: Testing the Thurstonian IRT Approach.
Ng V; Lee P; Ho MR; Kuykendall L; Stark S; Tay L
J Pers Assess; 2021; 103(2):224-237. PubMed ID: 32208939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
Qiu X; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Traditional scores versus IRT estimates on forced-choice tests based on a dominance model.
Hontangas PM; Leenen I; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Morillo D; Abad FJ
Psicothema; 2016; 28(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26820428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.
Xiao Y; Liu H; Li H
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():806. PubMed ID: 28572781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ipsative imputation for a 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale in community-dwelling elderly people.
Imai H; Furukawa TA; Kasahara Y; Ishimoto Y; Kimura Y; Fukutomi E; Chen WL; Tanaka M; Sakamoto R; Wada T; Fujisawa M; Okumiya K; Matsubayashi K
Psychogeriatrics; 2014 Sep; 14(3):182-7. PubMed ID: 25323959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.
Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Nieto MD; Morillo D
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2309. PubMed ID: 31681103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Motivational Value Systems Questionnaire (MVSQ): Psychometric Analysis Using a Forced Choice Thurstonian IRT Model.
Merk J; Schlotz W; Falter T
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1626. PubMed ID: 28979228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scoring based on item response theory did not alter the measurement ability of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales.
Petersen MA; Groenvold M; Aaronson N; Brenne E; Fayers P; Nielsen JD; Sprangers M; Bjorner JB;
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):902-8. PubMed ID: 16085193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.
Wetzel E; Frick S
Psychol Assess; 2020 Mar; 32(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 31738070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forced-Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.
Guenole N; Brown AA; Cooper AJ
Assessment; 2018 Jun; 25(4):513-526. PubMed ID: 27056730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
