191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148656)
1. Predicting chemical ocular toxicity using a combinatorial QSAR approach.
Solimeo R; Zhang J; Kim M; Sedykh A; Zhu H
Chem Res Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 25(12):2763-9. PubMed ID: 23148656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A three-tier QSAR modeling strategy for estimating eye irritation potential of diverse chemicals in rabbit for regulatory purposes.
Basant N; Gupta S; Singh KP
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():282-91. PubMed ID: 27018829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of eye irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis.
Kulkarni A; Hopfinger AJ; Osborne R; Bruner LH; Thompson ED
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 11158727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of skin irritation from organic chemicals using membrane-interaction QSAR analysis.
Kodithala K; Hopfinger AJ; Thompson ED; Robinson MK
Toxicol Sci; 2002 Apr; 66(2):336-46. PubMed ID: 11896301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel two-step hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling work flow for predicting acute toxicity of chemicals in rodents.
Zhu H; Ye L; Richard A; Golbraikh A; Wright FA; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2009 Aug; 117(8):1257-64. PubMed ID: 19672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in silico expert system for the identification of eye irritants.
Verma RP; Matthews EJ
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(5):383-95. PubMed ID: 25967253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of chemical toxicants tested against Tetrahymena pyriformis.
Zhu H; Tropsha A; Fourches D; Varnek A; Papa E; Gramatica P; Oberg T; Dao P; Cherkasov A; Tetko IV
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Apr; 48(4):766-84. PubMed ID: 18311912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of contributions of molecular fragments for eye irritation of organic chemicals using QSAR study.
Kar S; Roy K
Comput Biol Med; 2014 May; 48():102-8. PubMed ID: 24657909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of AmpC beta-lactamase binders vs. decoys using classification kNN QSAR modeling and application of the QSAR classifier to virtual screening.
Hsieh JH; Wang XS; Teotico D; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008 Sep; 22(9):593-609. PubMed ID: 18338225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a tiered in vitro testing strategy for assessing the ocular and dermal irritation/corrosion potential of pharmaceutical compounds for worker safety.
Graham JC; Wilt N; Costin GE; Villano C; Bader J; Krawiec L; Sly E; Gould J
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2018 Dec; 37(4):380-390. PubMed ID: 30035615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of in vitro HTS-derived concentration-response data as biological descriptors improves the accuracy of QSAR models of in vivo toxicity.
Sedykh A; Zhu H; Tang H; Zhang L; Richard A; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2011 Mar; 119(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 20980217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of rat acute toxicity by oral exposure.
Zhu H; Martin TM; Ye L; Sedykh A; Young DM; Tropsha A
Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Dec; 22(12):1913-21. PubMed ID: 19845371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for prediction of sensory irritants (logRD50) of volatile organic chemicals.
Luan F; Ma W; Zhang X; Zhang H; Liu M; Hu Z; Fan BT
Chemosphere; 2006 May; 63(7):1142-53. PubMed ID: 16307788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecotoxicological QSAR modeling of organic compounds against fish: Application of fragment based descriptors in feature analysis.
Khan K; Baderna D; Cappelli C; Toma C; Lombardo A; Roy K; Benfenati E
Aquat Toxicol; 2019 Jul; 212():162-174. PubMed ID: 31128417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimation of the chemical-induced eye injury using a weight-of-evidence (WoE) battery of 21 artificial neural network (ANN) c-QSAR models (QSAR-21): part I: irritation potential.
Verma RP; Matthews EJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):318-30. PubMed ID: 25497990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of cell viability assay data improves the prediction accuracy of conventional quantitative structure-activity relationship models of animal carcinogenicity.
Zhu H; Rusyn I; Richard A; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Apr; 116(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 18414635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting chemically-induced skin reactions. Part I: QSAR models of skin sensitization and their application to identify potentially hazardous compounds.
Alves VM; Muratov E; Fourches D; Strickland J; Kleinstreuer N; Andrade CH; Tropsha A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2015 Apr; 284(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 25560674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of pH measurements to predict the potential of chemicals to cause acute dermal and ocular toxicity.
Worth AP; Cronin MT
Toxicology; 2001 Dec; 169(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11718953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
