These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23148937)

  • 21. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
    Jang Y; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?
    Hu X; Li T; Zheng J; Su N; Liu Z; Luo L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142351. PubMed ID: 26556478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning: a developmental perspective.
    Koriat A; Ackerman R; Lockl K; Schneider W
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Mar; 102(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 19084238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of a nonverbal aid on preschoolers' recall for color.
    Ling J; Blades M
    J Genet Psychol; 2000 Sep; 161(3):314-24. PubMed ID: 10971910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face masks degrade our ability to remember face-name associations more than predicted by judgments of learning.
    Rodriguez AM; Festini SB
    Memory; 2024 Feb; 32(2):143-155. PubMed ID: 38166650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
    Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Self-paced study time as a cue for recall predictions across school age.
    Hoffmann-Biencourt A; Lockl K; Schneider W; Ackerman R; Koriat A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 28(Pt 4):767-84. PubMed ID: 21121466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using standards to improve middle school students' accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall.
    Lipko AR; Dunlosky J; Hartwig MK; Rawson KA; Swan K; Cook D
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 20025417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cognitive engagement and story comprehension in typically developing children and children with ADHD from preschool through elementary school.
    Lorch EP; Milich R; Astrin CC; Berthiaume KS
    Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1206-19. PubMed ID: 17087553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multiple imitation mechanisms in children.
    Subiaul F; Anderson S; Brandt J; Elkins J
    Dev Psychol; 2012 Jul; 48(4):1165-79. PubMed ID: 22201448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Embodiment meets metamemory: weight as a cue for metacognitive judgments.
    Alban MW; Kelley CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1628-34. PubMed ID: 23565793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does delaying judgments of learning really improve the efficacy of study decisions? Not so much.
    Kimball DR; Smith TA; Muntean WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):923-54. PubMed ID: 22250913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monitoring memory errors: the influence of the veracity of retrieved information on the accuracy of judgements of learning.
    Rhodes MG; Tauber SK
    Memory; 2011 Nov; 19(8):853-70. PubMed ID: 21999219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information.
    Corriveau K; Harris PL
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jan; 12(1):188-93. PubMed ID: 19120427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
    Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Why are children overconfident? Developmental differences in the implementation of accessibility cues when judging concept learning.
    van Loon M; de Bruin A; Leppink J; Roebers C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jun; 158():77-94. PubMed ID: 28236719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.