These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23149152)

  • 21. An optimization model for mastication and swallowing in mammals.
    Prinz JF; Lucas PW
    Proc Biol Sci; 1997 Dec; 264(1389):1715-21. PubMed ID: 9447729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Defining the end-point of mastication: A conceptual model.
    Gray-Stuart EM; Jones JR; Bronlund JE
    J Texture Stud; 2017 Oct; 48(5):345-356. PubMed ID: 28967214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bolus rheology of texture adjusted food-Effect of age.
    Stading M; Miljkovic A; Andersson J; Matsuo K
    J Texture Stud; 2023 Dec; 54(6):824-834. PubMed ID: 37463674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Objective and subjective hardness of a test item used for evaluating food mixing ability.
    Salleh NM; Fueki K; Garrett NR; Ohyama T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):174-83. PubMed ID: 17302945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of salivary fluid characteristics on the physical features of in vitro bread bolus: From the absence of saliva to artificially simulated hypersalivation.
    Avila-Sierra A; Decerle N; Ramaioli M; Peyron MA
    Food Res Int; 2024 Jan; 175():113753. PubMed ID: 38128995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of bolus size and hardness on within-subject variability of chewing cycle kinematics.
    Wintergerst AM; Throckmorton GS; Buschang PH
    Arch Oral Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 18093571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparisons between a mixing ability test and masticatory performance tests using a brittle or an elastic test food.
    Sugiura T; Fueki K; Igarashi Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 36(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 18713307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How do dairy cows chew?--particle size analysis of selected feeds with different particle length distributions and of respective ingested bolus particles.
    Schadt I; Ferguson JD; Azzaro G; Petriglieri R; Caccamo M; Van Soest P; Licitra G
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4707-20. PubMed ID: 22818484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relationship between masticatory variables and bolus characteristics of meat with different textures.
    Pematilleke N; Kaur M; Adhikari B; Torley PJ
    J Texture Stud; 2021 Dec; 52(5-6):552-560. PubMed ID: 34486121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of food oral processing, bolus characteristics, and digestive conditions on the protein digestibility of turkey cold meat and fresh cheese.
    Ribes S; Arnal M; Talens P
    Food Res Int; 2023 Nov; 173(Pt 1):113297. PubMed ID: 37803618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Swallowing threshold parameters of subjects with shortened dental arches.
    Kreulen CM; Witter DJ; Tekamp FA; Slagter AP; Creugers NH
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):639-43. PubMed ID: 22521703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of thickeners of food on the particle size of boluses: a consideration for swallowing.
    Yamaguchi E; Torisu T; Tada H; Tanabe Y; Kurogi T; Mikushi S; Murata H
    Odontology; 2019 Oct; 107(4):546-554. PubMed ID: 31076968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Identification of multiple compartments present during the mastication of solid food.
    Flynn CS; Foster KD; Bronlund JE; Lentle RG; Jones JR; Morgenstern MP
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 21087764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Swallowing threshold and masticatory performance in dentate adults.
    Fontijn-Tekamp FA; van der Bilt A; Abbink JH; Bosman F
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Dec; 83(3):431-6. PubMed ID: 15581665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Oral behavior from food intake until terminal swallow.
    Okada A; Honma M; Nomura S; Yamada Y
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Jan; 90(1):172-9. PubMed ID: 17078978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endoscopic evaluation of food bolus formation and its relationship with the number of chewing cycles.
    Fukatsu H; Nohara K; Kotani Y; Tanaka N; Matsuno K; Sakai T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Aug; 42(8):580-7. PubMed ID: 25777749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Main individual and product characteristics influencing in-mouth flavour release during eating masticated food products with different textures: mechanistic modelling and experimental validation.
    Doyennette M; Déléris I; Féron G; Guichard E; Souchon I; Trelea IC
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Jan; 340():209-21. PubMed ID: 24045155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Degree of particle size breakdown during mastication may be a possible cause of interindividual glycemic variability.
    Ranawana V; Monro JA; Mishra S; Henry CJ
    Nutr Res; 2010 Apr; 30(4):246-54. PubMed ID: 20534327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of process-induced common bean hardness on structural properties of
    Pallares Pallares A; Loosveldt B; Karimi SN; Hendrickx M; Grauwet T
    Br J Nutr; 2019 Aug; 122(4):388-399. PubMed ID: 31266547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oral declines and mastication deficiencies cause alteration of food bolus properties.
    Peyron MA; Santé-Lhoutellier V; François O; Hennequin M
    Food Funct; 2018 Feb; 9(2):1112-1122. PubMed ID: 29359227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.