BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23149339)

  • 1. Data integration of non-animal tests for the development of a test battery to predict the skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Nukada Y; Miyazawa M; Kazutoshi S; Sakaguchi H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Mar; 27(2):609-18. PubMed ID: 23149339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Sakaguchi H; Sono S; Mugita N; Hirota M; Miyazawa M; Ito Y; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Dec; 65(6):343-53. PubMed ID: 21767275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The relationship between CD86/CD54 expression and THP-1 cell viability in an in vitro skin sensitization test--human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).
    Sakaguchi H; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Kosaka N; Ito Y; Yoneyama K; Sono S; Itagaki H; Toyoda H; Suzuki H
    Cell Biol Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 25(2):109-26. PubMed ID: 18204907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.
    Nukada Y; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Hirota M; Sakaguchi H; Sasa H; Nishiyama N
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Oct; 26(7):1150-60. PubMed ID: 22796097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A dataset on 145 chemicals tested in alternative assays for skin sensitization undergoing prevalidation.
    Natsch A; Ryan CA; Foertsch L; Emter R; Jaworska J; Gerberick F; Kern P
    J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Nov; 33(11):1337-52. PubMed ID: 23576290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.
    Hirota M; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Takenouchi O; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1333-47. PubMed ID: 25824844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test battery with the human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay and DEREK based on a 139 chemical data set for predicting skin sensitizing potential and potency of chemicals.
    Takenouchi O; Fukui S; Okamoto K; Kurotani S; Imai N; Fujishiro M; Kyotani D; Kato Y; Kasahara T; Fujita M; Toyoda A; Sekiya D; Watanabe S; Seto H; Hirota M; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1318-32. PubMed ID: 25820183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of preservative sensitization potential using surface marker CD86 and/or CD54 expression on human cell line, THP-1.
    Sakaguchi H; Miyazawa M; Yoshida Y; Ito Y; Suzuki H
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2007 Feb; 298(9):427-37. PubMed ID: 17119987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-animal assessment of skin sensitization hazard: Is an integrated testing strategy needed, and if so what should be integrated?
    Roberts DW; Patlewicz G
    J Appl Toxicol; 2018 Jan; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28543848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The incorporation of lysine into the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay for skin sensitization assessments.
    Troutman JA; Foertsch LM; Kern PS; Dai HJ; Quijano M; Dobson RL; Lalko JF; Lepoittevin JP; Gerberick GF
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Aug; 122(2):422-36. PubMed ID: 21555337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction.
    Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.
    Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT.
    Sakaguchi H; Ashikaga T; Miyazawa M; Yoshida Y; Ito Y; Yoneyama K; Hirota M; Itagaki H; Toyoda H; Suzuki H
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Aug; 20(5):774-84. PubMed ID: 16337770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can currently available non-animal methods detect pre and pro-haptens relevant for skin sensitization?
    Patlewicz G; Casati S; Basketter DA; Asturiol D; Roberts DW; Lepoittevin JP; Worth AP; Aschberger K
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Dec; 82():147-155. PubMed ID: 27569201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.
    Sakaguchi H; Ryan C; Ovigne JM; Schroeder KR; Ashikaga T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2010 Sep; 24(6):1810-20. PubMed ID: 20510347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
    McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
    Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates.
    Ohtake T; Maeda Y; Hayashi T; Yamanaka H; Nakai M; Takeyoshi M
    Toxicology; 2018 Jan; 393():9-14. PubMed ID: 29100879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    Bauch C; Kolle SN; Fabian E; Pachel C; Ramirez T; Wiench B; Wruck CJ; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 21669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.
    Strickland J; Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Allen D; Choksi N; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Kleinstreuer N
    J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Mar; 37(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 27480324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.