These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23149418)

  • 1. Validity and reliability of new intravascular ultrasound analysis software for morphological measurement of coronary artery disease.
    Nakayama N; Hibi K; Endo M; Miyazawa A; Suzuki H; Maejima N; Isshiki T; Kozuma K; Kimura K
    Circ J; 2013; 77(2):424-31. PubMed ID: 23149418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical validation of a novel software for quantitative analysis of coronary intravascular ultrasound.
    Nijhoff F; Van Den Hengel KG; Slots TL; Stella PR; Agostoni P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014; 15(8):393-401. PubMed ID: 25456415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IVUS analysis of the acute and long-term stent result using motorized pullback: intraobserver and interobserver variability.
    Regar E; Werner F; Klauss V; Siebert U; Henneke KH; Rieber J; König A; Theisen K; Mudra H
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Nov; 48(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 10525220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in the evaluation of observer variability and reliability in the assessment of stent deployment: the OCTIVUS study.
    Magnus PC; Jayne JE; Garcia-Garcia HM; Swart M; van Es GA; Tijssen J; Kaplan AV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):229-35. PubMed ID: 25620044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of novel volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis software for coronary artery disease.
    Tsumori T; Kataoka T; Kobayashi Y; Xiaohui G; Takeshita H; Shirai N; Matsumoto R; Nakata S; Ehara S; Yoshiyama M
    Osaka City Med J; 2009 Jun; 55(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 19725429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usual dose of simvastatin does not inhibit plaque progression and lumen loss at the peri-stent reference segments after bare-metal stent implantation: a serial intravascular ultrasound analysis.
    Hong YJ; Jeong MH; Choi YH; Ma EH; Ko JS; Lee MG; Park KH; Sim DS; Yoon NS; Youn HJ; Kim KH; Park HW; Kim JH; Ahn Y; Cho JG; Park JC; Kang JC
    Korean J Intern Med; 2010 Dec; 25(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 21179272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency analysis after optimal coronary stenting with initial quantitative coronary angiography guidance: an ATHEROREMO sub-study.
    Sarno G; Garg S; Gomez-Lara J; Garcia Garcia HM; Ligthart J; Bruining N; Onuma Y; Witberg K; van Geuns RJ; de Boer S; Wykrzykowska J; Schultz C; Duckers HJ; Regar E; de Jaegere P; de Feyter P; van Es GA; Boersma E; van der Giessen W; Serruys PW;
    EuroIntervention; 2011 Mar; 6(8):977-84. PubMed ID: 21330246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hyperemic coronary flow after optimized intravascular ultrasound-guided balloon angioplasty and stent implantation.
    van Liebergen RA; Piek JJ; Koch KT; Peters RJ; de Winter RJ; Schotborgh CE; Lie KI
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Dec; 34(7):1899-906. PubMed ID: 10588201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproducibility of Femoropopliteal Artery Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.
    Soney H; Kakkilaya A; Vazquez DF; Banerjee R; Rosol Z; Tsai S; Banerjee S
    Am J Cardiol; 2023 Jul; 199():1-6. PubMed ID: 37210800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound virtual histology analysis.
    Prasad A; Cipher DJ; Prasad A; Mohandas A; Roesle M; Brilakis ES; Banerjee S
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2008; 9(2):71-7. PubMed ID: 18486080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intravascular ultrasound-based left main coronary artery assessment: comparison between pullback from left anterior descending and circumflex arteries.
    Suter Y; Schoenenberger AW; Toggweiler S; Jamshidi P; Resink T; Erne P
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Sep; 21(9):457-60. PubMed ID: 19726818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter assessment of the reproducibility of volumetric radiofrequency-based intravascular ultrasound measurements in coronary lesions that were consecutively stented.
    Huisman J; Egede R; Rdzanek A; Böse D; Erbel R; Kochman J; Jensen LO; van der Palen J; Hartmann M; Mintz GS; von Birgelen C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):1867-78. PubMed ID: 22246064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new method to measure necrotic core and calcium content in coronary plaques using intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency-based analysis.
    Shin ES; Garcia-Garcia HM; Serruys PW
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Apr; 26(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 20063068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy.
    Marwan M; Pflederer T; Schepis T; Seltmann M; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 21245696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Segmental comparison between a dedicated bifurcation stent and balloon angioplasty using intravascular ultrasound and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography: A subgroup analysis of the Tryton IDE randomized trial.
    Grundeken MJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kumsars I; Lesiak M; Kayaert P; Dens J; Stella PR; de Winter RJ; Laak LL; Généreux P; Kaplan AV; Leon MB; Wykrzykowska JJ; Onuma Y; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Feb; 89(2):E53-E63. PubMed ID: 27083384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of neointima quantification with motorized intravascular ultrasound pullback in stented coronary arteries.
    Regar E; Werner F; Siebert U; Rieber J; Theisen K; Mudra H; Klauss V
    Am Heart J; 2000 Apr; 139(4):632-7. PubMed ID: 10740144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.
    Wang X; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Lee T; Zhang W; Cao Y; Fujino A; Lin Y; Usui E; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T; Maehara A
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):869-879. PubMed ID: 28797408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between three-dimensional angiographic reconstruction and intravascular ultrasound: imaging of the left main coronary artery.
    Spoon DB; Rubinshtein R; Psaltis PJ; Sandhu GS; Lennon R; Rihal CS; Lerman A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 81(7):1156-61. PubMed ID: 23436576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple and rapid method for identification of lesions at high risk for the no-reflow phenomenon immediately before elective coronary stent implantation.
    Suda A; Namiuchi S; Kawaguchi T; Nihei T; Takii T; Saji K; Sugie T; Kato A; Shimokawa H
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1904-1914. PubMed ID: 26936449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.