These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23149458)

  • 1. Bayesian methods for estimating GEBVs of threshold traits.
    Wang CL; Ding XD; Wang JY; Liu JF; Fu WX; Zhang Z; Yin ZJ; Zhang Q
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Mar; 110(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 23149458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian methods for jointly estimating genomic breeding values of one continuous and one threshold trait.
    Wang C; Li X; Qian R; Su G; Zhang Q; Ding X
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175448. PubMed ID: 28410429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast genomic prediction of breeding values using parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo with convergence diagnosis.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Niu H; Wang Z; Liang Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Ni H; Guo Y; Hay EHA; Gao X; Gao H; Wu X; Xu L; Li J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 29298666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracies of genomic prediction for twenty economically important traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle.
    Zhu B; Guo P; Wang Z; Zhang W; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao H; Wang Z; Gao X; Xu L; Li J
    Anim Genet; 2019 Dec; 50(6):634-643. PubMed ID: 31502261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of five methods for genomic breeding value estimation for the common dataset of the 15th QTL-MAS Workshop.
    Wang CL; Ma PP; Zhang Z; Ding XD; Liu JF; Fu WX; Weng ZQ; Zhang Q
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. PubMed ID: 22640547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection.
    Habier D; Fernando RL; Kizilkaya K; Garrick DJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():186. PubMed ID: 21605355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of methods for predicting genomic breeding values for growth traits in Nellore cattle.
    Terakado APN; Costa RB; Irano N; Bresolin T; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Baldi F; Del Pilar Solar Diaz I; de Albuquerque LG
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2021 Jun; 53(3):349. PubMed ID: 34101031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic prediction with parallel computing for slaughter traits in Chinese Simmental beef cattle using high-density genotypes.
    Guo P; Zhu B; Xu L; Niu H; Wang Z; Guan L; Liang Y; Ni H; Guo Y; Chen Y; Zhang L; Gao X; Gao H; Li J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179885. PubMed ID: 28723906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Feb; 94(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 22353246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy.
    Jia Y; Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2012 Dec; 192(4):1513-22. PubMed ID: 23086217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian mapping of quantitative trait loci for complex binary traits.
    Yi N; Xu S
    Genetics; 2000 Jul; 155(3):1391-403. PubMed ID: 10880497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The power of genomic estimated breeding values for selection when using a finite population size in genetic improvement of tetraploid potato.
    Selga C; Reslow F; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Ortiz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 34849763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving accuracy of genomic prediction by genetic architecture based priors in a Bayesian model.
    Gao N; Li J; He J; Xiao G; Luo Y; Zhang H; Chen Z; Zhang Z
    BMC Genet; 2015 Oct; 16():120. PubMed ID: 26466667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo estimation of genetic parameters.
    Mathew B; Bauer AM; Koistinen P; Reetz TC; Léon J; Sillanpää MJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Oct; 109(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 22805656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.
    Habier D; Tetens J; Seefried FR; Lichtner P; Thaller G
    Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Feb; 42(1):5. PubMed ID: 20170500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parallel Markov chain Monte Carlo - bridging the gap to high-performance Bayesian computation in animal breeding and genetics.
    Wu XL; Sun C; Beissinger TM; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA; Gatti Nde L; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Sep; 44(1):29. PubMed ID: 23009363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of genomic selection methods for predicting fiber quality traits in Upland cotton.
    Islam MS; Fang DD; Jenkins JN; Guo J; McCarty JC; Jones DC
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2020 Jan; 295(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 31473809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers.
    Moser G; Tier B; Crump RE; Khatkar MS; Raadsma HW
    Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Dec; 41(1):56. PubMed ID: 20043835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.