184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23149797)
1. The impact of continuously-variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry.
Boylan C; McWilliam A; Johnstone E; Rowbottom C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 13(6):4023. PubMed ID: 23149797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of a new control system for Elekta accelerators facilitating continuously variable dose rate.
Bertelsen A; Lorenzen EL; Brink C
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4802-10. PubMed ID: 21928653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.
Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Hindmarsh J; Lim SB; Lovelock DM; Fuangrod T; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 28564208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Beam modeling and VMAT performance with the Agility 160-leaf multileaf collimator.
Bedford JL; Thomas MD; Smyth G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(2):4136. PubMed ID: 23470941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Texture analysis on the fluence map to evaluate the degree of modulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Park SY; Kim IH; Ye SJ; Carlson J; Park JM
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111718. PubMed ID: 25370632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT.
Park JM; Wu HG; Kim JH; Carlson JN; Kim K
Br J Radiol; 2015 May; 88(1049):20140698. PubMed ID: 25734490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Wang Q; Dai J; Zhang K
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101712. PubMed ID: 24089902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Milan T; Grogan G; Ebert MA; Rowshanfarzad P
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):1984-1994. PubMed ID: 30870581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric impact and detectability of multi-leaf collimator positioning errors on Varian Halcyon.
Gay SS; Netherton TJ; Cardenas CE; Ger RB; Balter PA; Dong L; Mihailidis D; Court LE
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):47-55. PubMed ID: 31294923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quasi real time in vivo dosimetry for VMAT.
Fidanzio A; Porcelli A; Azario L; Greco F; Cilla S; Grusio M; Balducci M; Valentini V; Piermattei A
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):062103. PubMed ID: 24877830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A generalized inverse planning tool for volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Cao D; Afghan MK; Ye J; Chen F; Shepard DM
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6725-38. PubMed ID: 19841516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interplay effect on a 6-MV flattening-filter-free linear accelerator with high dose rate and fast multi-leaf collimator motion treating breast and lung phantoms.
Netherton T; Li Y; Nitsch P; Shaitelman S; Balter P; Gao S; Klopp A; Muruganandham M; Court L
Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2369-2376. PubMed ID: 29611210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three commercial dosimetric systems in detecting clinically significant VMAT delivery errors.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Young T; Thwaites D; Holloway L
Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1238-1244. PubMed ID: 27717741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward real-time verification for MLC tracking treatments using time-resolved EPID imaging.
Zwan BJ; Caillet V; Booth JT; Colvill E; Fuangrod T; O'Brien R; Briggs A; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):953-964. PubMed ID: 33354787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
