These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23150053)

  • 1. Replicating distinctive facial features in lineups: identification performance in young versus older adults.
    Badham SP; Wade KA; Watts HJ; Woods NG; Maylor EA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 23150053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Creating fair lineups for suspects with distinctive features.
    Zarkadi T; Wade KA; Stewart N
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1448-53. PubMed ID: 19883492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The aging eyewitness: effects of age on face, delay, and source-memory ability.
    Memon A; Bartlett J; Rose R; Gray C
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2003 Nov; 58(6):P338-45. PubMed ID: 14614118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?
    Kaesler M; Dunn JC; Ransom K; Semmler C
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):35. PubMed ID: 32754862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age.
    Wright DB; Stroud JN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 12508699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling face similarity in police lineups.
    Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 141(6):1228-65. PubMed ID: 26011788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental trends in lineup performance: Adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults.
    Brackmann N; Sauerland M; Otgaar H
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):428-440. PubMed ID: 30478519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition.
    Searcy JH; Bartlett JC; Memon A
    Mem Cognit; 1999 May; 27(3):538-52. PubMed ID: 10355242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators.
    Carlson CA; Hemby JA; Wooten AR; Jones AR; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Dias JL; Whittington JE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):14. PubMed ID: 33660118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing police lineups to maximize memory performance.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Wetmore SA; Flowe HD; Mickes L
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):410-430. PubMed ID: 31094561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Cataldo AM
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):21. PubMed ID: 32405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.