195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23150163)
1. Computer navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty.
Tolk JJ; Koot HW; Janssen RP
J Knee Surg; 2012 Sep; 25(4):347-52. PubMed ID: 23150163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Barrett WP; Mason JB; Moskal JT; Dalury DF; Oliashirazi A; Fisher DA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1273-1284.e1. PubMed ID: 21723703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system.
Seo SS; Seo JH; Sohn MW; Kim YJ
Orthopedics; 2012 Oct; 35(10 Suppl):50-5. PubMed ID: 23026253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?
Kamat YD; Aurakzai KM; Adhikari AR; Matthews D; Kalairajah Y; Field RE
Int Orthop; 2009 Dec; 33(6):1567-70. PubMed ID: 19034445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA.
Anderl W; Pauzenberger L; Kölblinger R; Kiesselbach G; Brandl G; Laky B; Kriegleder B; Heuberer P; Schwameis E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jan; 24(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25326759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
Boonen B; Schotanus MG; Kerens B; van der Weegen W; van Drumpt RA; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Oct; 21(10):2206-12. PubMed ID: 23928929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Choong PF; Dowsey MM; Stoney JD
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jun; 24(4):560-9. PubMed ID: 18534397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Margin of error in alignment: a study undertaken when converting from conventional to computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Maniar RN; Johorey AC; Pujary CT; Yadava AN
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 20171044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accelerometer-Based and Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Reduction in Mechanical Axis Outliers Does Not Lead to Improvement in Functional Outcomes or Quality of Life When Compared to Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Goh GS; Liow MHL; Tay DK; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Tan MH
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):379-385. PubMed ID: 29054725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty achieves better postoperative alignment compared to conventional and patient-specific instrumentation in a low-volume setting.
Suero EM; Lueke U; Stuebig T; Hawi N; Krettek C; Liodakis E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 104(7):971-975. PubMed ID: 29704634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised trial comparing computer-assisted surgery with conventional techniques.
Blakeney WG; Khan RJ; Palmer JL
Knee; 2014 Mar; 21(2):364-8. PubMed ID: 24703685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: comparison of jig-based technique versus computer navigation for clinical and alignment outcome.
Hasegawa M; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2011 Jun; 19(6):904-10. PubMed ID: 20811732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial.
Gøthesen O; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Petursson G; Hallan G; Strøm E; Dyrhovden G; Furnes O
Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):609-18. PubMed ID: 24788494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty - A comparison of patient-specific implants with the conventional technique.
Arbab D; Reimann P; Brucker M; Bouillon B; Lüring C
Knee; 2018 Oct; 25(5):882-887. PubMed ID: 29936030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plain radiograph fails to reflect the alignment and advantages of navigation in total knee arthroplasty.
Choi WC; Lee S; An JH; Kim D; Seong SC; Lee MC
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Aug; 26(5):756-64. PubMed ID: 20875940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. No Benefit of Computer-assisted TKA: 10-year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study.
Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lino L; Flecher X; Pesenti S; Argenson JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):126-134. PubMed ID: 29529627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative mechanical axis deviation after TKA between conventional and CAS procedure.
Leelasestaporn C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Feb; 93(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 20302002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of the Medium-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted and Conventional Techniques to Treat Patients With Extraarticular Femoral Deformities.
Bae DK; Song SJ; Park CH; Ko YW; Lee H
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27460297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty for patients with retained implants in the femur.
Lin SY; Chen CH; Huang PJ; Fu YC; Huang HT
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2014 Aug; 30(8):415-21. PubMed ID: 25002380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Jig-Based Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Hasegawa M; Miyazaki S; Yamaguchi T; Wakabayashi H; Sudo A
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 27503697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
