These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23150792)

  • 1. The evolution of homophily.
    Fu F; Nowak MA; Christakis NA; Fowler JH
    Sci Rep; 2012; 2():845. PubMed ID: 23150792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complexity in models of cultural niche construction with selection and homophily.
    Creanza N; Feldman MW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):10830-7. PubMed ID: 25024189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple mating reveals complex patterns of assortative mating by personality and body size.
    Montiglio PO; Wey TW; Chang AT; Fogarty S; Sih A
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 26332682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coevolutionary networks with homophily and heterophily.
    Kimura D; Hayakawa Y
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Jul; 78(1 Pt 2):016103. PubMed ID: 18764016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolutionary Dynamics of Homophily and Heterophily.
    Ramazi P; Cao M; Weissing FJ
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22766. PubMed ID: 26951038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Social and spatial effects on genetic variation between foraging flocks in a wild bird population.
    Radersma R; Garroway CJ; Santure AW; de Cauwer I; Farine DR; Slate J; Sheldon BC
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Oct; 26(20):5807-5819. PubMed ID: 28792645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Worth the Weight: Conceptualizing and Measuring Strong Versus Weak Tie Homophily.
    McMillan C
    Soc Networks; 2022 Jan; 68():139-147. PubMed ID: 34305296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
    Conte GL; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multi-model inference of non-random mating from an information theoretic approach.
    Carvajal-Rodríguez A
    Theor Popul Biol; 2020 Feb; 131():38-53. PubMed ID: 31756362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.
    Bonduriansky R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2001 Aug; 76(3):305-39. PubMed ID: 11569787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multidimensional Homophily in Friendship Networks.
    Block P; Grund T
    Netw Sci (Camb Univ Press); 2014 Aug; 2(2):189-212. PubMed ID: 25525503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Projecting social contact matrices to populations stratified by binary attributes with known homophily.
    Kadelka C
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 Jan; 20(2):3282-3300. PubMed ID: 36899581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating homophily in networks via HONTO (HOmophily Network TOol): a case study of chromosomal interactions in human PPI networks.
    Apollonio N; Blankenberg D; Cumbo F; Franciosa PG; Santoni D
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36440918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Homophily influences ranking of minorities in social networks.
    Karimi F; Génois M; Wagner C; Singer P; Strohmaier M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11077. PubMed ID: 30038426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network homophily and the evolution of the pay-it-forward reciprocity.
    Chiang YS; Takahashi N
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e29188. PubMed ID: 22195019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. You can't always get what you want: size assortative mating by mutual mate choice as a resolution of sexual conflict.
    Baldauf SA; Kullmann H; Schroth SH; Thünken T; Bakker TC
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Jun; 9():129. PubMed ID: 19515244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental evolution of mating discrimination in budding yeast.
    Leu JY; Murray AW
    Curr Biol; 2006 Feb; 16(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 16461281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combinatorial characterizations and impossibilities for higher-order homophily.
    Veldt N; Benson AR; Kleinberg J
    Sci Adv; 2023 Jan; 9(1):eabq3200. PubMed ID: 36608141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.