These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23150792)

  • 21. Experimental evolution of mating discrimination in budding yeast.
    Leu JY; Murray AW
    Curr Biol; 2006 Feb; 16(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 16461281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Combinatorial characterizations and impossibilities for higher-order homophily.
    Veldt N; Benson AR; Kleinberg J
    Sci Adv; 2023 Jan; 9(1):eabq3200. PubMed ID: 36608141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Correlated genotypes in friendship networks.
    Fowler JH; Settle JE; Christakis NA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Feb; 108(5):1993-7. PubMed ID: 21245293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual imprinting: what strategies should we expect to see in nature?
    Chaffee DW; Griffin H; Gilman RT
    Evolution; 2013 Dec; 67(12):3588-99. PubMed ID: 24299410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating.
    Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 10937179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating.
    Otto SP; Servedio MR; Nuismer SL
    Genetics; 2008 Aug; 179(4):2091-112. PubMed ID: 18660541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A model for the evolution of assortative mating.
    de Cara MA; Barton NH; Kirkpatrick M
    Am Nat; 2008 May; 171(5):580-96. PubMed ID: 18419568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences.
    Jennions MD; Petrie M
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 1997 May; 72(2):283-327. PubMed ID: 9155244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Inequality as information: Wealth homophily facilitates the evolution of cooperation.
    Johnson T; Smirnov O
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):11605. PubMed ID: 30072773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Homophily, heterophily and the diversity of messages among decision-making individuals.
    Ramazi P; Riehl J; Cao M
    R Soc Open Sci; 2018 Apr; 5(4):180027. PubMed ID: 29765693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Synergistic selection between ecological niche and mate preference primes diversification.
    Boughman JW; Svanbäck R
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):6-22. PubMed ID: 27748954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mechanisms of Assortative Mating in Speciation with Gene Flow: Connecting Theory and Empirical Research.
    Kopp M; Servedio MR; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ; Rodríguez RL; Hauber ME; Scordato EC; Symes LB; Balakrishnan CN; Zonana DM; van Doorn GS
    Am Nat; 2018 Jan; 191(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 29244561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Birds of a feather: homophily and sexual network structure in sub-Saharan Africa.
    Kenyon C; Colebunders R
    Int J STD AIDS; 2013 Mar; 24(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 23535354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct fitness benefits explain mate preference, but not choice, for similarity in heterozygosity levels.
    Zandberg L; Gort G; van Oers K; Hinde CA
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Oct; 20(10):1306-1314. PubMed ID: 28868784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Geography, assortative mating, and the effects of sexual selection on speciation with gene flow.
    Servedio MR
    Evol Appl; 2016 Jan; 9(1):91-102. PubMed ID: 27087841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Formation of homophily in academic performance: Students change their friends rather than performance.
    Smirnov I; Thurner S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183473. PubMed ID: 28854202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Similar preferences for ornamentation in opposite- and same-sex choice experiments.
    Cardoso GC; Leitão AV; Funghi C; Batalha HR; Lopes RJ; Mota PG
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Dec; 27(12):2798-806. PubMed ID: 25371062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The evolution of sexual imprinting in socially monogamous populations.
    Invernizzi E; Gilman RT
    Curr Zool; 2015 Dec; 61(6):1043-1061. PubMed ID: 32256541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genotype-by-environment interactions for precopulatory mate guarding in a lek-mating insect.
    Vellnow N; Schindler S; Schmoll T
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Nov; 10(21):12138-12146. PubMed ID: 33209276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.