These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23150873)

  • 1. The effects of forehead and neck positions on profile esthetics.
    Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Roeinpeikar M
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2012; 7(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 23150873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic evaluation of incisor inclination in smiling profiles with respect to mandibular position.
    Zarif Najafi H; Oshagh M; Khalili MH; Torkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 26321336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.
    Oliveira MD; Silveira BL; Mattos CT; Marquezan M
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 26154461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 17973684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Divine Proportion in the facial profile of young females.
    Jahanbin A; Basafa M; Alizadeh Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 19075430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-perception of facial esthetics by patients with different profiles compared with assessments of orthodontists and lay people.
    Volpato GH; de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Oltramari PVP; Freire Fernandes TM; de Almeida MR; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Dec; 158(6):840-848. PubMed ID: 33256916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people.
    Ioi H; Shimomura T; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 18929266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of preferred lip positions according to different age groups.
    Park NS; Park JH; Bayome M; Mo SS; Kim Y; Kook YA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 42(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 23141151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of facial, dental, and smile esthetics by dental students.
    Alhammadi MS; Halboub E; Al-Mashraqi AA; Al-Homoud M; Wafi S; Zakari A; Mashali W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Sep; 30(5):415-426. PubMed ID: 30144369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Esthetic evaluation of lip position in silhouette with respect to profile divergence.
    Zarif Najafi H; Sabouri SA; Ebrahimi E; Torkan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jun; 149(6):863-70. PubMed ID: 27241997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinician, dental student, and orthognathic patient perception of black-and-white silhouette lateral profile dimensions of ideal chin position in a Chinese population.
    Jiang Z; Tan L; Hu L; Wang C; Wang H; Xie Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Jan; 125(1):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 29153275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferences of AP position of the straight Caucasian facial profile.
    Mees S; Jiménez Bellinga R; Mommaerts MY; De Pauw GA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):755-63. PubMed ID: 23453133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the effect of buccal corridor size on smile attractiveness.
    Oshagh M; Zarif NH; Bahramnia F
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2010; 5(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 21069108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.