384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23151831)
1. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.
Halligan S; Mallett S; Altman DG; McQuillan J; Proud M; Beddoe G; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 21084409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noncathartic CT colonography to screen for colorectal neoplasia in subjects with a family history of colorectal cancer.
Fini L; Laghi L; Hassan C; Pestalozza A; Pagano N; Balzarini L; Repici A; Pickhardt PJ; Malesci A
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 24475809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection.
Park SH; Kim SY; Lee SS; Bogoni L; Kim AY; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Byeon JS; Ye BD; Ha HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 19542397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.
Sali L; Delsanto S; Sacchetto D; Correale L; Falchini M; Ferraris A; Gandini G; Grazzini G; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Morra L; Laghi A; Mascalchi M; Regge D
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4783-4791. PubMed ID: 29796918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps in CT colonography with and without fecal tagging: a stand-alone evaluation.
Mang T; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Wolf M; Raykar V; Macari M; Pickhardt PJ; Iafrate F; Laghi A; Weber M; Baker ME; Ringl H; Herold CJ; Graser A
Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 21934519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography.
de Haan MC; Nio CY; Thomeer M; de Vries AH; Bossuyt PM; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Stoker J
Radiology; 2012 Sep; 264(3):771-8. PubMed ID: 22771881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.
Utano K; Nagata K; Honda T; Mitsushima T; Yasuda T; Kato T; Horita S; Asano M; Oda N; Majima K; Kawamura Y; Hirayama M; Watanabe N; Kanazawa H; Lefor AK; Sugimoto H
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):399-407. PubMed ID: 27580426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CT colonography for combined colonic and extracolonic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.
Kim HJ; Park SH; Pickhardt PJ; Yoon SN; Lee SS; Yee J; Kim DH; Kim AY; Kim JC; Yu CS; Ha HK
Radiology; 2010 Dec; 257(3):697-704. PubMed ID: 20876390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
