164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23151851)
1. Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, without the need for arterial blood signals.
Enmi J; Kudomi N; Hayashi T; Yamamoto A; Iguchi S; Moriguchi T; Hori Y; Koshino K; Zeniya T; Jon Shah N; Yamada N; Iida H
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Dec; 57(23):7873-92. PubMed ID: 23151851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Knutsson L; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Risberg J; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 17896379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attempts to improve absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a simplified T1-weighted steady-state cerebral blood volume approach.
Wirestam R; Knutsson L; Risberg J; Börjesson S; Larsson EM; Gustafson L; Passant U; Ståhlberg F
Acta Radiol; 2007 Jun; 48(5):550-6. PubMed ID: 17520432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation.
Brunecker P; Villringer A; Schultze J; Nolte CH; Jungehülsing GJ; Endres M; Steinbrink J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Nov; 25(9):1300-11. PubMed ID: 17462846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved reliability of perfusion estimation in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI by using the arterial input function from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Tseng CH; Jaspers J; Romero AM; Wielopolski P; Smits M; van Osch MJP; Vos F
NMR Biomed; 2024 Jan; 37(1):e5038. PubMed ID: 37712359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.
Conturo TE; Akbudak E; Kotys MS; Chen ML; Chun SJ; Hsu RM; Sweeney CC; Markham J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 16261571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perfusion-related parameters in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging compared with CBV and CBF measured by dynamic susceptibility-contrast MR technique.
Wirestam R; Borg M; Brockstedt S; Lindgren A; Holtås S; Ståhlberg F
Acta Radiol; 2001 Mar; 42(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 11281143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of quantitative dynamic susceptibility-contrast MRI perfusion estimates obtained using different contrast-agent administration schemes at 3T.
Wirestam R; Thilmann O; Knutsson L; Björkman-Burtscher IM; Larsson EM; Ståhlberg F
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e86-91. PubMed ID: 19720489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with a prebolus contrast agent administration design for improved absolute quantification of perfusion.
Knutsson L; Lindgren E; Ahlgren A; van Osch MJ; Bloch KM; Surova Y; Ståhlberg F; van Westen D; Wirestam R
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Oct; 72(4):996-1006. PubMed ID: 24285621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of perfusion MRI by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery and dynamic susceptibility contrast in rats with permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion.
Hofmeijer J; Schepers J; van der Worp HB; Kappelle LJ; Nicolay K
NMR Biomed; 2005 Oct; 18(6):390-4. PubMed ID: 16075409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.
Calamante F
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2013 Oct; 74():1-32. PubMed ID: 24083460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of the arterial input function on the measured perfusion values and infarct volumetric in acute cerebral ischemia evaluated by perfusion computed tomography.
Bisdas S; Konstantinou GN; Gurung J; Lehnert T; Donnerstag F; Becker H; Vogl TJ; Koh TS
Invest Radiol; 2007 Mar; 42(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 17287644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer.
Onxley JD; Yoo DS; Muradyan N; MacFall JR; Brizel DM; Craciunescu OI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 24929169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of partial-volume effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.
Chen JJ; Smith MR; Frayne R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Sep; 22(3):390-9. PubMed ID: 16104009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic selection of arterial input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images.
Peruzzo D; Bertoldo A; Zanderigo F; Cobelli C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Dec; 104(3):e148-57. PubMed ID: 21458099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calculation of cerebral perfusion parameters using regional arterial input functions identified by factor analysis.
Knutsson L; Larsson EM; Thilmann O; Ståhlberg F; Wirestam R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Apr; 23(4):444-53. PubMed ID: 16523467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Kotys MS; Akbudak E; Markham J; Conturo TE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Mar; 25(3):598-611. PubMed ID: 17326084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of using local arterial input functions on cerebral blood flow estimation.
Lorenz C; Benner T; Lopez CJ; Ay H; Zhu MW; Aronen H; Karonen J; Liu Y; Nuutinen J; Sorensen AG
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 16767708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of cerebral blood flow in chronic carotid occlusive disease: comparison of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging with positron emission tomography.
Mukherjee P; Kang HC; Videen TO; McKinstry RC; Powers WJ; Derdeyn CP
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):862-71. PubMed ID: 12748086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative cerebral blood flow with bolus tracking perfusion MRI: measurements in porcine model and comparison with H(2)(15)O PET.
Kellner E; Mix M; Reisert M; Förster K; Nguyen-Thanh T; Splitthoff DN; Gall P; Kiselev VG; Mader I
Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1723-34. PubMed ID: 24375612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
