These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23151961)

  • 1. Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Feb; 75(2):257-77. PubMed ID: 23151961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA; Folk CL
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brain and Cognitive Mechanisms of Top-Down Attentional Control in a Multisensory World: Benefits of Electrical Neuroimaging.
    Matusz PJ; Turoman N; Tivadar RI; Retsa C; Murray MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Mar; 31(3):412-430. PubMed ID: 30513045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contingent capture effects in temporal order judgments.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Pratt J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 25938252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection.
    Burnham BR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1003-1023. PubMed ID: 31432340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the generality of the displaywide contingent orienting hypothesis: can a visual onset capture attention without top-down control settings for displaywide onset?
    Yeh SL; Liao HI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Oct; 135(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 20638648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.
    Ansorge U; Heumann M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):937-48. PubMed ID: 14585015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The illusion of control: Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture.
    Huffman G; Antinucci VM; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2238-2244. PubMed ID: 29330680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Setting semantics: conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention.
    Goodhew SC; Kendall W; Ferber S; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Aug; 76(6):1577-89. PubMed ID: 24824982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments.
    Goller F; Ansorge U
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1574-84. PubMed ID: 25832193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining whether attentional control settings are inclusive or exclusive.
    Pratt J; McAuliffe J
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Nov; 64(8):1361-70. PubMed ID: 12519032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contingent capture can occur at specific feature values: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Jiao J; Zhao G; Wang Q; Zhang K; Li H; Sun HJ; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Feb; 92(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 23069637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The time course of the contingent spatial blink.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Goodin Z; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is top-down about contingent capture?
    Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.