These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23153252)

  • 41. The intelligibility of Lombard speech for non-native listeners.
    Cooke M; Lecumberri ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1120-9. PubMed ID: 22894231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Acceptance of noise with intelligible, reversed, and unfamiliar primary discourse.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE
    Am J Audiol; 2008 Dec; 17(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18840706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Speech Recognition at the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Morlas H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):443-450. PubMed ID: 26055834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The impact of listening condition on background noise acceptance for young adults with normal hearing.
    Gordon-Hickey S; Moore RE; Estis JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 55(5):1356-72. PubMed ID: 22411277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influence of Speech Recognition Ability on Acceptable Noise Level for Mandarin (Chinese) Speakers with Normal Hearing.
    Hu XJ; Lau CC
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(5):371-379. PubMed ID: 37166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Relationship Between Auditory and Visual Noise Acceptance in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    Faulkner KF; Plyler PN; Easterday MK; Slade TM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Feb; 31(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 31287056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
    van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Relationship between the Mandarin acceptable noise level and the personality traits in normal hearing adults].
    Wu D; Chen JY; Wang S; Zhang MH; Chen J; Li YL; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 48(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 23755783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Loudness as a cue for acceptable noise levels.
    Recker KL; McKinney MF; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 25313550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes.
    Eaves JM; Summerfield AQ; Kitterick PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Acceptable noise level and psychophysical masking.
    Rishiq DA; Harkrider AW; Hedrick MS
    Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 22718324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?
    Olsen SØ; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 24219089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of repeated measurements and working memory on the most comfortable level in the ANL test.
    Brännström KJ; Olsen SØ; Holm L; Kastberg T; Ibertsson T
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):787-95. PubMed ID: 25156233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests.
    van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.