272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23153318)
1. Budget impact analysis of everolimus for the treatment of hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer in the United States.
Xie J; Diener M; De G; Yang H; Wu EQ; Namjoshi M
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(2):278-88. PubMed ID: 23153318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Budget impact analysis of everolimus for the treatment of hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer in Kazakhstan.
Lewis L; Taylor M; Suriya Ertugyrovna Y; Kuanysh Shadybayevich N; Kaldygul Kabakovna S; Ramil Zufarovich A
J Med Econ; 2015 Mar; 18(3):189-99. PubMed ID: 25415641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost utility and budget impact of third-generation aromatase inhibitors for advanced breast cancer: a literature-based model analysis of costs in the Italian National Health Service.
Marchetti M; Caruggi M; Colombo G
Clin Ther; 2004 Sep; 26(9):1546-61. PubMed ID: 15531017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re: Xie J, Diener M, De G, et al. Budget impact analysis of everolimus for the treatment of hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer in the United States. J Med Econ 2014;16(2):278-88.
Diaby V; Adunlin G; Montero AJ
J Med Econ; 2014 Apr; 17(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 24506762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Budget impact of including ribociclib in combination with letrozole on US payer formulary: first-line treatment of post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Mistry R; Suri G; Young K; Hettle R; May JR; Brixner D; Oderda G; Biskupiak J; Tang D; Bhattacharyya D; Bhattacharyya S; Mishra D; Dalal AA
Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Dec; 34(12):2143-2150. PubMed ID: 30032697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic Evaluations of Everolimus Versus Other Hormonal Therapies in the Treatment of HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer From a US Payer Perspective.
Xie J; Hao Y; Zhou ZY; Qi CZ; De G; Glück S
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15(5):e263-76. PubMed ID: 26048087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Budget impact analysis of ixabepilone used according to FDA approved labeling in treatment-resistant metastatic breast cancer.
Ho J; Zhang L; Todorova L; Whillans F; Corey-Lisle P; Yuan Y
J Manag Care Pharm; 2009; 15(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 19610679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of everolimus for second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Serbia.
Mihajlović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Sabo A; Tomić Z; Postma MJ
Clin Ther; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1909-22. PubMed ID: 24238790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Budget impact analysis of niraparib and olaparib for maintenance treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer in the US.
Wu L; Zhong L
J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 30522378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of letrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
Delea TE; Karnon J; Sofrygin O; Thomas SK; Papo NL; Barghout V
Clin Breast Cancer; 2007 Jun; 7(8):608-18. PubMed ID: 17592673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Budget impact of everolimus for the treatment of progressive, well-differentiated, non-functional neuroendocrine tumors of gastrointestinal or lung origin that are advanced or metastatic.
Rose DB; Nellesen D; Neary MP; Cai B
J Med Econ; 2017 Apr; 20(4):395-404. PubMed ID: 27981858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Targeted erlotinib for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a budget impact analysis.
Bajaj PS; Veenstra DL; Goertz HP; Carlson JJ
J Med Econ; 2014 Aug; 17(8):538-46. PubMed ID: 24716717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of medical costs and healthcare resource utilization of post-menopausal women with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving everolimus-based therapy or chemotherapy: a retrospective claims database analysis.
Li N; Hao Y; Koo V; Fang A; Peeples M; Kageleiry A; Wu EQ; Guérin A
J Med Econ; 2016; 19(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 27032967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Budget impact analysis of the use of oral and intravenous anti-cancer drugs for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Benjamin L; Buthion V; Iskedjian M; Farah B; Rioufol C; Vidal-Trécan G
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):96-107. PubMed ID: 22970840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost effectiveness and budget impact of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.
Chiao E; Meyer K
Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1445-54. PubMed ID: 19422279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-World Analysis of Medical Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization in Elderly Women with HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Everolimus-Based Therapy or Chemotherapy.
Hao Y; Li N; Fang AP; Koo V; Peeples M; Kageleiry A; Wu EQ; Guérin A
Adv Ther; 2016 Jun; 33(6):983-97. PubMed ID: 27216253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Budget impact analysis of tapentadol extended release for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic noncancer pain.
Merchant S; Noe LL; Howe A; Duff S; Gricar J; Ogden K; Mody SH
Clin Ther; 2013 May; 35(5):659-72. PubMed ID: 23587608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of everolimus vs sunitinib in treating patients with advanced, progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in the United States.
Casciano R; Chulikavit M; Perrin A; Liu Z; Wang X; Garrison LP
J Med Econ; 2012; 15 Suppl 1():55-64. PubMed ID: 22881362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A global economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of new treatments for advanced breast cancer in Canada.
Beauchemin C; Letarte N; Mathurin K; Yelle L; Lachaine J
J Med Econ; 2016 Jun; 19(6):619-29. PubMed ID: 26850287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The budget impact of adding pralsetinib to a US health plan formulary for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer and thyroid cancer with
Duff S; Bargiacchi F; Norregaard C; Brener M; Sullivan E
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2022 Feb; 28(2):218-231. PubMed ID: 34726500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
