114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23153591)
1. Old versus new FIGO staging systems in predicting overall survival in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a study of 86 cases.
Lim D; Wang WL; Lee CH; Dodge T; Gilks B; Oliva E
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Feb; 128(2):322-6. PubMed ID: 23153591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive value of FIGO and AJCC staging systems in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Raut CP; Nucci MR; Wang Q; Manola J; Bertagnolli MM; Demetri GD; Morgan JA; Muto MG; Fletcher CD; George S
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Nov; 45(16):2818-24. PubMed ID: 19647426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. FIGO staging for carcinosarcoma: can the revised staging system predict overall survival?
Pradhan TS; Stevens EE; Ablavsky M; Salame G; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Nov; 123(2):221-4. PubMed ID: 21889193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extended surgical staging for uterine papillary serous carcinoma: survival outcome of locoregional (Stage I-III) disease.
Bristow RE; Asrari F; Trimble EL; Montz FJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 11330963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution.
Tabbaa ZM; Gonzalez J; Sznurkowski JJ; Weaver AL; Mariani A; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Oct; 127(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 22704951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison between FIGO old and new staging criteria of endometrial carcinoma].
Jobo T; Ohkawara S; Kuramoto H; Hata H; Shimoda T; Tsunoda S; Tsujii A
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Jan; 43(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 1997614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New revised FIGO 2008 staging system for endometrial cancer produces better discrimination in survival compared with the 1988 staging system.
Kato T; Watari H; Endo D; Mitamura T; Odagiri T; Konno Y; Hosaka M; Kobayashi N; Todo Y; Sudo S; Takeda M; Dong P; Kaneuchi M; Kudo M; Sakuragi N
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Dec; 106(8):938-41. PubMed ID: 22740340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
Cooke EW; Pappas L; Gaffney DK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(18):4231-7. PubMed ID: 21387282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison between old and new FIGO staging of endometrial carcinoma--the significance of positive peritoneal cytology].
Yokosuka K; Katase K; Umezawa S; Hirai Y; Hasumi K
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Dec; 46(12):1359-65. PubMed ID: 7852775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uterine leiomyosarcoma: an updated series.
Rauh-Hain JA; Oduyebo T; Diver EJ; Guseh SH; George S; Muto MG; del Carmen MG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1036-43. PubMed ID: 23714705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The outcome of stage I-II clinically and surgically staged papillary serous and clear cell endometrial cancers when compared with endometrioid carcinoma.
Cirisano FD; Robboy SJ; Dodge RK; Bentley RC; Krigman HR; Synan IS; Soper JT; Clarke-Pearson DL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 10739691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems.
Zivanovic O; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Jacks LM; Zhou Q; Abu-Rustum NR; Soslow RA; Juretzka MM; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Brennan MF; Hensley ML
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(12):2066-72. PubMed ID: 19255317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of prognosis in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer staged IB in FIGO 1988 and 2009 classifications.
Gottwald L; Moszynska-Zielińska M; Spych M; Korczynski J; Tylinski W; Szwalski J; Kubiak R; Pasz-Walczak G; Sobotkowski J; Suzin J; Piekarski J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Oct; 286(4):995-1000. PubMed ID: 22627994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [An analysis of prognostic significance of new FIGO staging (1989) of endometrial cancer].
Nishiya M; Sakuragi N; Tanaka T; Ohkohchi T; Takeda N; Tsumura N; Hirahatake K; Satoh C; Fujimoto S
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Apr; 43(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 2066616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological grade predicts for recurrence in patients with uterine endometrioid carcinoma without myometrial involvement.
Zaki MA; Robbins JR; Fatteh S; Mahan MG; Hanna RK; Elshaikh MA
Anticancer Res; 2012 Sep; 32(9):4061-5. PubMed ID: 22993361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of tumor size as staging variable in the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I leiomyosarcoma: a population-based study.
Garg G; Shah JP; Liu JR; Bryant CS; Kumar S; Munkarah A; Morris RT
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1201-6. PubMed ID: 20940535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of tumor morcellation during surgery on the prognosis of patients with apparently early uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Park JY; Park SK; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Aug; 122(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 21565389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterine leiomyosarcoma in asian patients: validation of the revised Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging system and identification of prognostic classifiers.
Tan PS; Koh E; Pang C; Ong WS; Ngo L; Soh LT; Quek R; Chay WY; Ho TH; Tay SK; Chew SH; Lim-Tan SK; Khoo-Tan H; Lim SL; Busmanis I; Goh LK; Chia YN; Chia WK; Lim T
Oncologist; 2012; 17(10):1286-93. PubMed ID: 22829569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
