These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23153724)

  • 1. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.
    Bommarco R; Kleijn D; Potts SG
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 23153724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An integrated approach to monitoring ecosystem services and agriculture: implications for sustainable agricultural intensification in Rwanda.
    Rosa MF; Bonham CA; Dempewolf J; Arakwiye B
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jan; 189(1):15. PubMed ID: 27975330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Projected water consumption in future global agriculture: scenarios and related impacts.
    Pfister S; Bayer P; Koehler A; Hellweg S
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(20):4206-16. PubMed ID: 21840571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence.
    Pretty J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Feb; 363(1491):447-65. PubMed ID: 17652074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Human and ecosystem health: the environment-agriculture connection in developing countries.
    Graber DR; Jones WJ; Johnson JA
    J Agromedicine; 1995; 2(3):47-64. PubMed ID: 12291328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Think globally, research locally: paradigms and place in agroecological research.
    Reynolds HL; Smith AA; Farmer JR
    Am J Bot; 2014 Oct; 101(10):1631-9. PubMed ID: 25326612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combined effects of agrochemicals and ecosystem services on crop yield across Europe.
    Gagic V; Kleijn D; Báldi A; Boros G; Jørgensen HB; Elek Z; Garratt MPD; de Groot GA; Hedlund K; Kovács-Hostyánszki A; Marini L; Martin E; Pevere I; Potts SG; Redlich S; Senapathi D; Steffan-Dewenter I; Świtek S; Smith HG; Takács V; Tryjanowski P; van der Putten WH; van Gils S; Bommarco R
    Ecol Lett; 2017 Nov; 20(11):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 28901046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world.
    Kremen C
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2020 Sep; 4(2):229-240. PubMed ID: 32886114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plant Functional Traits: Soil and Ecosystem Services.
    Faucon MP; Houben D; Lambers H
    Trends Plant Sci; 2017 May; 22(5):385-394. PubMed ID: 28209328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ecological Intensification: Bridging the Gap between Science and Practice.
    Kleijn D; Bommarco R; Fijen TPM; Garibaldi LA; Potts SG; van der Putten WH
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Feb; 34(2):154-166. PubMed ID: 30509848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Policies for Ecological Intensification of Crop Production.
    Garibaldi LA; Pérez-Méndez N; Garratt MPD; Gemmill-Herren B; Miguez FE; Dicks LV
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Apr; 34(4):282-286. PubMed ID: 30745253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change.
    Kremen C; Williams NM; Aizen MA; Gemmill-Herren B; LeBuhn G; Minckley R; Packer L; Potts SG; Roulston T; Steffan-Dewenter I; Vázquez DP; Winfree R; Adams L; Crone EE; Greenleaf SS; Keitt TH; Klein AM; Regetz J; Ricketts TH
    Ecol Lett; 2007 Apr; 10(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 17355569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
    Pywell RF; Heard MS; Woodcock BA; Hinsley S; Ridding L; Nowakowski M; Bullock JM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Oct; 282(1816):20151740. PubMed ID: 26423846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Socioeconomic influences on biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being: a quantitative application of the DPSIR model in Jiangsu, China.
    Hou Y; Zhou S; Burkhard B; Müller F
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Aug; 490():1012-28. PubMed ID: 24914530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Closing Yield Gaps: How Sustainable Can We Be?
    Pradhan P; Fischer G; van Velthuizen H; Reusser DE; Kropp JP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129487. PubMed ID: 26083456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smart investments in sustainable food production: revisiting mixed crop-livestock systems.
    Herrero M; Thornton PK; Notenbaert AM; Wood S; Msangi S; Freeman HA; Bossio D; Dixon J; Peters M; van de Steeg J; Lynam J; Parthasarathy Rao P; Macmillan S; Gerard B; McDermott J; Seré C; Rosegrant M
    Science; 2010 Feb; 327(5967):822-5. PubMed ID: 20150490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crop fertilization affects pollination service provision - Common bean as a case study.
    Ramos DL; Bustamante MMC; Silva FDDSE; Carvalheiro LG
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0204460. PubMed ID: 30388124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Poverty alleviation strategies in eastern China lead to critical ecological dynamics.
    Zhang K; Dearing JA; Dawson TP; Dong X; Yang X; Zhang W
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Feb; 506-507():164-81. PubMed ID: 25460950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecological and economic dynamics of the Shunde agricultural system under China's small city development strategy.
    Lu H; Campbell DE
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Jun; 90(8):2589-600. PubMed ID: 19246149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mixed crop-livestock systems: an economic and environmental-friendly way of farming?
    Ryschawy J; Choisis N; Choisis JP; Joannon A; Gibon A
    Animal; 2012 Oct; 6(10):1722-30. PubMed ID: 22717157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.