These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23153799)

  • 1. Spatial analysis of corresponding fingerprint features from match and close non-match populations.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Jul; 230(1-3):87-98. PubMed ID: 23153799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modern statistical models for forensic fingerprint examinations: a critical review.
    Abraham J; Champod C; Lennard C; Roux C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 Oct; 232(1-3):131-50. PubMed ID: 24053874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the weight of fingerprint evidence through the spatial relationship, directions and types of minutiae observed on fingermarks.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Yoo M; Genessay T; Langenburg G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Mar; 248():154-71. PubMed ID: 25637956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of any number of minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 Jan; 52(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 17209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--modelling within finger variability.
    Egli NM; Champod C; Margot P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):189-95. PubMed ID: 16914278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computation of likelihood ratios in fingerprint identification for configurations of three minutiae.
    Neumann C; Champod C; Puch-Solis R; Egli N; Anthonioz A; Meuwly D; Bromage-Griffiths A
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1255-66. PubMed ID: 17199611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence evaluation in fingerprint comparison and automated fingerprint identification systems--Modeling between finger variability.
    Egli Anthonioz NM; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Feb; 235():86-101. PubMed ID: 24447455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introducing a semi-automatic method to simulate large numbers of forensic fingermarks for research on fingerprint identification.
    Rodriguez CM; de Jongh A; Meuwly D
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 22103733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios.
    Alberink I; de Jongh A; Rodriguez C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):70-81. PubMed ID: 24180303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fingerprint pattern restoration by digital image processing techniques.
    Wen CY; Yu CC
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Sep; 48(5):973-84. PubMed ID: 14535661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fingerprint reconstruction: from minutiae to phase.
    Feng J; Jain AK
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2011 Feb; 33(2):209-23. PubMed ID: 21193805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A robust and non-invertible fingerprint template for fingerprint matching system.
    Trivedi AK; Thounaojam DM; Pal S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():256-265. PubMed ID: 29791890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A support vector machine approach for truncated fingerprint image detection from sweeping fingerprint sensors.
    Chen CJ; Pai TW; Cheng M
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Mar; 15(4):7807-22. PubMed ID: 25835186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of pore features into the evaluation of fingerprint evidence.
    Anthonioz A; Champod C
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jan; 59(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 24148081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection and Rectification of Distorted Fingerprints.
    Si X; Feng J; Zhou J; Luo Y
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2015 Mar; 37(3):555-68. PubMed ID: 26353261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Online fingerprint verification.
    Upendra K; Singh S; Kumar V; Verma HK
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 17365425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Research on the local regional similarity of automatic fingerprint identification system fingerprints based on close non-matches in a ten million people database-Taking the central region of whorl as an example.
    Li S; Li K; Yang J; Liu Y; Han W; Luo Y
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Mar; 68(2):488-499. PubMed ID: 36650636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards Contactless, Low-Cost and Accurate 3D Fingerprint Identification.
    Kumar A; Kwong C
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2015 Mar; 37(3):681-96. PubMed ID: 26353269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.