272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23153999)
1. Mammogram-based discriminant fusion analysis for breast cancer diagnosis.
Li JB; Wang YH; Tang LL
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(6):710-6. PubMed ID: 23153999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences.
Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jun; 24(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 15957600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technique for preprocessing of digital mammogram.
Maitra IK; Nag S; Bandyopadhyay SK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Aug; 107(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 21669471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Temporal change analysis for characterization of mass lesions in mammography.
Timp S; Varela C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):945-53. PubMed ID: 17649908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of normal tissue context in computer-aided detection of masses in mammograms.
Hupse R; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):2033-41. PubMed ID: 19666331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiscale curvelet transform.
Eltoukhy MM; Faye I; Samir BB
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2010 Jun; 34(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 20004076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs.
Timp S; van Engeland S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2005 Aug; 32(8):2629-38. PubMed ID: 16193793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification.
Salfity MF; Nishikawa RM; Jiang Y; Papaioannou J
Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):823-31. PubMed ID: 12772990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An evaluation of contrast enhancement techniques for mammographic breast masses.
Singh S; Bovis K
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2005 Mar; 9(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 15787013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Identification of the breast edge using areas enclosed by iso-intensity contours.
Padayachee J; Alport MJ; Rae WI
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007 Sep; 31(6):390-400. PubMed ID: 17398069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The performance of computer-aided detection when analyzing prior mammograms of newly detected breast cancers with special focus on the time interval from initial imaging to detection.
Malich A; Schmidt S; Fischer DR; Facius M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 18337045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mass auto-detection in mammogram based on wavelet transform modulus maximum.
Ke L; He W; Kang Y
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():5760-3. PubMed ID: 19963653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A completely automated CAD system for mass detection in a large mammographic database.
Bellotti R; De Carlo F; Tangaro S; Gargano G; Maggipinto G; Castellano M; Massafra R; Cascio D; Fauci F; Magro R; Raso G; Lauria A; Forni G; Bagnasco S; Cerello P; Zanon E; Cheran SC; Lopez Torres E; Bottigli U; Masala GL; Oliva P; Retico A; Fantacci ME; Cataldo R; De Mitri I; De Nunzio G
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3066-75. PubMed ID: 16964885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of breast tissue classification techniques.
Oliver A; Freixenet J; Martà R; Zwiggelaar R
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 2):872-9. PubMed ID: 17354855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dual system approach to computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Zhou C; Ge J
Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4157-68. PubMed ID: 17153394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-scale textural feature extraction and particle swarm optimization based model selection for false positive reduction in mammography.
Zyout I; Czajkowska J; Grzegorzek M
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2():95-107. PubMed ID: 25795630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views.
van Engeland S; Timp S; Karssemeijer N
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3203-12. PubMed ID: 17022213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A probabilistic framework for image information fusion with an application to mammographic analysis.
Velikova M; Lucas PJ; Samulski M; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2012 May; 16(4):865-75. PubMed ID: 22326491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection of breast masses on mammograms: dual system approach with two-view analysis.
Wei J; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Zhou C; Hadjiiski LM; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4451-60. PubMed ID: 19928076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of architectural distortion in mammograms.
Ayres FJ; Rangayyan RM
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15709538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
