BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23154809)

  • 1. Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions.
    Olson-Manning CF; Wagner MR; Mitchell-Olds T
    Nat Rev Genet; 2012 Dec; 13(12):867-77. PubMed ID: 23154809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid adaptation of recombining populations on tunable fitness landscapes.
    Li J; Amado A; Bank C
    Mol Ecol; 2024 May; 33(10):e16900. PubMed ID: 36855836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multidimensional adaptive evolution of a feed-forward network and the illusion of compensation.
    Bullaughey K
    Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 23289561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic analysis of differentiation among breeding ponds reveals a candidate gene for local adaptation in Rana arvalis.
    Richter-Boix A; Quintela M; Segelbacher G; Laurila A
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Apr; 20(8):1582-600. PubMed ID: 21332585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cryptic genetic variation: evolution's hidden substrate.
    Paaby AB; Rockman MV
    Nat Rev Genet; 2014 Apr; 15(4):247-58. PubMed ID: 24614309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term adaptation of epistatic genetic networks.
    Yukilevich R; Lachance J; Aoki F; True JR
    Evolution; 2008 Sep; 62(9):2215-35. PubMed ID: 18564374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coalescent under the evolution of coadaptation.
    Ryo Takahasi K
    Mol Ecol; 2009 Dec; 18(24):5018-29. PubMed ID: 19912539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distributions of epistasis in microbes fit predictions from a fitness landscape model.
    Martin G; Elena SF; Lenormand T
    Nat Genet; 2007 Apr; 39(4):555-60. PubMed ID: 17369829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution.
    Williford A; Comeron JM
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 20421321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robustness to noise in gene expression evolves despite epistatic constraints in a model of gene networks.
    Draghi J; Whitlock M
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2345-58. PubMed ID: 26200818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying selection acting on a complex trait using allele frequency time series data.
    Illingworth CJ; Parts L; Schiffels S; Liti G; Mustonen V
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Apr; 29(4):1187-97. PubMed ID: 22114362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The evolution of genetic networks by non-adaptive processes.
    Lynch M
    Nat Rev Genet; 2007 Oct; 8(10):803-13. PubMed ID: 17878896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extensive linkage disequilibrium and parallel adaptive divergence across threespine stickleback genomes.
    Hohenlohe PA; Bassham S; Currey M; Cresko WA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 367(1587):395-408. PubMed ID: 22201169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproduction cost reduces demographic stochasticity and enhances inter-individual compatibility.
    Le Cunff Y; Pakdaman K
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():263-270. PubMed ID: 25036438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epistasis among adaptive mutations in deer mouse hemoglobin.
    Natarajan C; Inoguchi N; Weber RE; Fago A; Moriyama H; Storz JF
    Science; 2013 Jun; 340(6138):1324-7. PubMed ID: 23766324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gene flow and selection interact to promote adaptive divergence in regions of low recombination.
    Samuk K; Owens GL; Delmore KE; Miller SE; Rennison DJ; Schluter D
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Sep; 26(17):4378-4390. PubMed ID: 28667780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Organization principles in genetic interaction networks.
    Jacobs C; Segrè D
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2012; 751():53-78. PubMed ID: 22821453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What we have also learned: adaptive speciation is theoretically plausible.
    Doebeli M; Dieckmann U; Metz JA; Tautz D
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):691-5; discussion 696-9. PubMed ID: 15856711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fitness effects of beneficial mutations: the mutational landscape model in experimental evolution.
    Betancourt AJ; Bollback JP
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2006 Dec; 16(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 17055718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolutionary capacitance may be favored by natural selection.
    Masel J
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1359-71. PubMed ID: 15911577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.